My Photo

Ordering Information

Tomi on Twitter is @tomiahonen

  • Follow Tomi on Twitter as @tomiahonen
    Follow Tomi's Twitterfloods on all matters mobile, tech and media. Tomi has over 8,000 followers and was rated by Forbes as the most influential writer on mobile related topics

Book Tomi T Ahonen to Speak at Your Event

  • Contact Tomi T Ahonen for Speaking and Consulting Events
    Please write email to tomi (at) tomiahonen (dot) com and indicate "Speaking Event" or "Consulting Work" or "Expert Witness" or whatever type of work you would like to offer. Tomi works regularly on all continents

Tomi on Video including his TED Talk

  • Tomi on Video including his TED Talk
    See Tomi on video from several recent keynote presentations and interviews, including his TED Talk in Hong Kong about Augmented Reality as the 8th Mass Media

Subscribe


Blog powered by Typepad

« Filling In the Missing Bits: Kantar Numbers and World Smartphone Market | Main | Twenty Years of Digital Convergence Around Mobile: What can we learn from the Cannibal of Cannibals? »

March 17, 2017

Comments

Winter

This made the newspapers in the Netherlands. albeit on an inside page:
http://www.volkskrant.nl/economie/adidas-zoekt-jonge-doelgroep-op-sociale-media~a4475920/

Adapted Google Translate:
Adidas is looking for young audience on social media

Advertisers stop TV advertising

The young customers of the large German manufacturer of sports equipment do not watch much TV, so advertisers are looking for them on social media. It seems part of a trend with serious implications for traditional media.

Tomi T Ahonen

Hi Wayne and Winter

Yeah it is a logical step on a tech evolution path. If we look back, at some point the telegraph and fax for example went through this same type of evolution, where at one point major corporations had telegraph offices in their major office buildings and then at some point shifted away from even using a telegraph anymore; and faxes we can remember the time when a good office setup included a fax machine and gosh, for me the last time I sent a fax was in the previous decade when some I think law office needed some signature faxed to them haha...

I honestly do not foresee the end of TV as such (will not go the way of the Zeppelin or steam engines like in travel) but if TV starts to see such erosion where some brands not just shift their ad dollars to digital media and REDUCE their TV expenditure, and then some major brands STOP altogether TV ad spend, that is a huge shock to the TV industry and will mean -- cost savings, belt-tightening, lower ad rates to retain customers, cut staff, cut expenses, pay less for sports rights, fire more staff, pay less for TV programs, actors, directors, tech crew, it means even less local/own production, more purchased mass entertainment prodcuts like the major reality TV shows, and so forth...

It means the golden age of TV will have ended or is about to end. Assuming Adidas is not the only one who did this but is the 'Canary in the coal mine' who dies first. And if this now signals the start of even a modest trend away from TV, that would mean we had witnessed (or are just now witnessing) 'Peak TV' as a mass media transition moment.

It is interesting times and we have to see what else we hear from the 5th Mass Media haha..

Tomi Ahonen :-)

b

@wayne

> Sports is the main "keep people paying for cable" anchors

It is almost funny how you wrong you are! I guess that is your personal reason! See: "Sports are no savior to big cable bundles, survey says -- Sports are often seen as the linchpin keeping people in pricey cable packages, but a recent survey found most subscribers don't need games to keep paying for TV. Plus, many sports fans would pony up for streaming."

https://www.cnet.com/news/sports-arent-the-savior-of-big-cable-bundles-survey-says/

Tomi T Ahonen

Hi b and Wayne

b - welcome to the blog.

Both - yeah, its a bit of this and a bit of that. I agree with you Wayne that its shocking specifically for a sports brand but on the other hand, for me it is not shocking its a youth-oriented brand. Say a Pepsodent type of brand would perhaps be more shocking.

b - I understand what you mean and for many cable TV viewers that is indeed true, but I would side with Wayne on this. Even so, then the 'last vestige' of the reasons to subscribe to cable TV is for very many sports fans, the sports coverage. Obviously only part of TV viewers are of the type of sports fan who would even care (some people dont' watch any sports). For me personally it was Formula 1 racing which was the last bit that kept me on a cable TV subscription when all other reasons to bother to pay for cable TV had already ended for me. So in that way, while it will not 'save' cable and is not the 'universal' reason, it is probably the single biggest reason that actually drives premium cable TV payments - live sports. And that then will be of course regional depending on what are the local passionate sports from say US baseball to European football/soccer to say India and cricket or say Canada and ice hockey etc...

Tomi Ahonen :-)

grogxd

Well, just by sponsoring major teams like Real Madrid and Barcelona big brands like Nike and Adidas have worldwide exposure both on TV and the Internet. Maybe they will advertise on TV again if clubs start to ask for higher fees.

It'll be more evident when second and third-tier brands follow path.

Anyway this is indeed big as it would had been unthought of three years ago.

Tester

@Wayne Brady:

"That there is a DEMAND for paid streaming, doesn't mean there is a SUPPLY for it. All the current paid streaming deals specifically exclude your local market's teams. We pay for MLB streaming so that our daughter can watch our local team while in college. My wife and I can't stream those games. We can watch ANY OTHER game, but the one we are most likely to want to watch."

And for how long can they keep it up? That's a classic case of ignoring the customer's needs when designing a product. In the end it artificially extends the lifetime of an undesirable product and sooner or later the time will come that the tie is broken and someone floods the gap. And then it's goodbye to those who ignored realities.

As for TV advertisement, I cannot say it surprises me that it's the most affluent and most desirable customers that get lost. They get their entertainment through other channels that are most likely less ad infested. What's left are older people and children, and not surprisingly these are the groups that are most heavily targeted by TV ads here in Germany.
Of course I still watch TV, but I rarely watch classic TV stations, most of what I do is streaming or downloads, because it allows me to watch stuff when I want, not when some TV executive thinks is best.

Overall, though, I wouldn't blame mobile here. The TV developments are to a large part independent of that and the writing had been on the wall for years that classic TV is on its slow way out as it poorly syncs with today's technical capabilities of content delivery - it's just that mobile is the best alternative to reach the intended target.

Tester

@Wayne:

It's strange that others are repeating the same mistakes as the music industry.
The best example is eBooks. The publishers are so scared of piracy that the copy protection they demand gave Amazon a quasi-monopoly on eBooks, because they were the only ones who had enough resources to create hardware that was tailored to their services.

And people happily continue to pirate eBooks, because most have no interest in paying almost print price for such heavily usage restricted items.

Winter

@Tester
"The publishers are so scared of piracy ..."

You see this in industries where the main intermediates are afraid of being disintermediated. It is not priacy that they are afraid of, it is self-publishing that they fear. Anti-piracy policies, e.g., DRM, are aimed at making self-publishing harder. In the end, the Amazons and iTunes take over anyway.

ch

@Tester

Ads are not target at the affluent but the young. They are the people who change brands.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Available for Consulting and Speakerships

  • Available for Consulting & Speaking
    Tomi Ahonen is a bestselling author whose twelve books on mobile have already been referenced in over 100 books by his peers. Rated the most influential expert in mobile by Forbes in December 2011, Tomi speaks regularly at conferences doing about 20 public speakerships annually. With over 250 public speaking engagements, Tomi been seen by a cumulative audience of over 100,000 people on all six inhabited continents. The former Nokia executive has run a consulting practise on digital convergence, interactive media, engagement marketing, high tech and next generation mobile. Tomi is currently based out of Helsinki but supports Fortune 500 sized companies across the globe. His reference client list includes Axiata, Bank of America, BBC, BNP Paribas, China Mobile, Emap, Ericsson, Google, Hewlett-Packard, HSBC, IBM, Intel, LG, MTS, Nokia, NTT DoCoMo, Ogilvy, Orange, RIM, Sanomamedia, Telenor, TeliaSonera, Three, Tigo, Vodafone, etc. To see his full bio and his books, visit www.tomiahonen.com Tomi Ahonen lectures at Oxford University's short courses on next generation mobile and digital convergence. Follow him on Twitter as @tomiahonen. Tomi also has a Facebook and Linked In page under his own name. He is available for consulting, speaking engagements and as expert witness, please write to tomi (at) tomiahonen (dot) com

Tomi's eBooks on Mobile Pearls

  • Pearls Vol 1: Mobile Advertising
    Tomi's first eBook is 171 pages with 50 case studies of real cases of mobile advertising and marketing in 19 countries on four continents. See this link for the only place where you can order the eBook for download

Tomi Ahonen Almanac 2009

  • Tomi Ahonen Almanac 2009
    A comprehensive statistical review of the total mobile industry, in 171 pages, has 70 tables and charts, and fits on your smartphone to carry in your pocket every day.

Alan's Third Book: No Straight Lines

Tomi's Fave Twitterati