This is one of the saddest stories in the mobile industry. Today Nokia's handset unit is gone.
Microsoft has just bought Nokia's total handset unit - not just smartphones but also dumbphones - and the Nokia services business (of what is left of it) and gets it all for a paltry 5.3 Billion Euros. Truly catastrophic. Just before Elop announced his mad Microsoft strategy, in the last quarter of 2010, Nokia's handset unit - this which was now sold - produced revenues of .. 8.35 Billion Euros - and did this very profitably! For the full year 2010, Nokia's handset unit generated 27 Billion Euros of revenues and 3.5 Billion Euros of profits!!! Elop wrecked all that in two and a half years and now the loss-making unit is sold for less than its scrap value.
What remains of Nokia, it is now back to its roots as a network equipment provider (NokiaSiemens Networks, that kind of business) competing with Ericsson and Alcatel-Lucent and the Chinese giants Huawei and ZTE.
What becomes of Microsoft? It now is a handset maker. Its Windows Phone gets a new lease-of-life (certainly by now Nokia internally must have wanted to shift away from the dead platform). But the last remaining Windows Phone partners no doubt will further diminish their efforts so Windows Phone will become purely a Microsoft handset OS. I predict that Windows Phone under Microsoft ownership will sell less phones (by market share) than it managed when independent companies such as Nokia, HTC, Samsung and others made Windows Phone devices. There is a reason why it is failing, and the reason was not Nokia design devices, it was the dislike of Microsoft and its ways of doing business.
Microsoft does gain the dumbphone unit of Nokia to plunder now, and attempt to convert into Windows Phone devices. Good luck with that, it goes totally against Windows history and competence, trying to create something very slim and streamlined and cheap to sell to Emerging World markets where free rivals are popular from Linux on PCs to Android obviously on handsets. Expect this share to continue to diminish over time, as the past Nokia-ness of the Microsoft handset unit becomes ever more 'Microsoftian'. With Elop in chrage of that unit at Microsoft, expect the damage to continue and this unit to be a failure at Microsoft in the long run.
The good news is that Elop is gone in that process, he shifts back to Microsoft. I will return with my epilogue or perhaps a few blogs about this a bit later, I am about to board a plane now. I'll digest the news and blog an update when I arrive at my hotel tonight.
PS - I might have to write that book..
Usual misleading info: put things into perspective and you discover that in big markets (China) android is dominating and growing the most...
Plus, what conspiring? In fact, It's a matter of denying evidence, rather. Nokia's dwindling cash was largely due to the NSN acquisition, which in turn was made to pave the way to MS' takeover of Nokia. No conspiracy, simple facts. Boring if you don't care, but nothing to do with the market normal functioning.
Remember: if business decisions defy common sense, things stink. This MS Nokia saga is no exception.
Posted by: Earendil Star | September 03, 2013 at 11:24 PM
'' I am at the Cathay Pacific first class lounge here at Hong Kong airport waiting to fly to New Delhi to deliver the opening address to the MMA Forum there but am sipping a double shot of Glenlivet 18yo Single Malt whisky and am having just melancholic thoughts about the once-world's-most-beloved phone brand ''' Tomi I am a little bit disappointed. You could at least drink Irish Whiskey. We all know its by far the best !! :)
Guys don't forget this is subject to shareholder approval. Investors that are here. Im sure we all know how to vote. We might not be able to prevent MS getting their dirty hands on Nokia but Im going to do my best to make sure they pay fair.
Posted by: logic001 | September 03, 2013 at 11:42 PM
@Earendil Star:
You know, if you want to see a conspiracy you can always twist the facts to fit your view of things. Without any conclusive proof that doesn't mean anything, though. And that you don't have. In fact there is no proof whatsoever and I don't happen to believe in conspiracy theories that are based 100% on make-believe without any hard facts confirming them. I just see some badly done business.
Case in point: The NSN takeover. Please tell me, what should Nokia have done? Their hand was forced or they would have lost a lot more if someone else had gotten it. And I do not see any correlation to the sale of the devices unit. That had been in the making for several months before NSN even became an issue.
The conspiracy doesn't even make sense because now Microsoft is the proud owner of a weak loss-making handset unit that will require quire a bit of cash infusion to get working again - if at all. In fact the final outcome of this mess is the worst case scenario that could have possibly happened to Microsoft. Instead of shifting the business risk to their partners they now have to shoulder it alone. Instead of a healthy, thriving ecosystem they got a comatose patient on life support. Instead of getting a significant share in the desirable high end phone business the majority of WP sales is at the opposite end of the spectrum.
So please tell me, what did they gain? Microsoft needed a healthy partner to get their system into the market. They had no use for a rotting corpse. But now they are forced to buy it anyway because if they don't, WP would die a very sudden death in the near future.
Posted by: Tester | September 03, 2013 at 11:58 PM
@logic001:
Try as you want, but as I see it, most shareholders will be glad that this dead meat has finally been excised.
Why keep a loss making business unit and another barely profitable unit that's already scheduled to be wound down in the upcoming years? (Feature phones are a dying business and everybody knows that.)
The Nokia management put it quite fittingly when they said this was about 'maximizing shareholder value'. In plain English that phrase means that they are glad to be rid of that business which would have dragged them down into the abyss.
Posted by: Tester | September 04, 2013 at 12:04 AM
@Tester
'Prove it! That's what it'd come down to. You got to prove that Elop deliberately acted against Nokia's best interest to make a formal accusation.'
No. This is not a court, there is no need for 'formal accusations'. Conspiracies by its very nature are secretive. The facts are often hidden and do not come to light until years after. That does not mean that the conspiracy does not exist, however. If it looks like a dog, barks like a dog, acts like a dog, chances are it is a dog. No need to scrutinise pedigrees.
Posted by: Jac | September 04, 2013 at 04:22 AM
@Earendil Star
Not everybody is buying Tomi's Evil Elop theory. I think it is rubbish, based on the public evidence. And I had no opinion on the probability of succes in the move to WP. I wasn't interested in computing the odds, because as far as I am concerned, there will always be a number 1 and a number 2 ecosystem to program for. That doesn't mean that i cannot understand the reasoning, it means that I do not have to care. Wait and see.
@ Jac
There is more than one conspiracy theory possible. What about the one I made up: The Nokia Board conned Microsoft into buying its failing phone business by hiring one of their managers as CEO, getting preferred licensee status, makimg MS completely dependent on Nokia for WP, and creating a "crisis" forcing MS to buy the dying phone business?
It explains all the facts as well as the Evil Elop theory, is much more lattering for the Finns. Unless of course you like being the underdog getting s*****d by the Evil Microsoft empire.
Posted by: Sander van der Wal | September 04, 2013 at 08:17 AM
@Sander van der Wal
What evidence do you have to characterise Nokia's phone business as 'failing'?
Seems to me that Nokia's phone business was the strongest and most profitable in the world at the the time of this proposed scheme to dump it on an unsuspecting Microsoft.
It does seem like the board has made the most of the lemons that they found themselves with. They keep the brand, all the patents, the maps and NSN for almost enough cash to buy a controlling interest outright.
It seems very much like they decided not to sell out to Microsoft but didn't have any other good offers. When their backs were against the wall they sold the worthless phone division to Microsoft for enough to absorb all of NSN and still have a viable business.
If only they had a better offer.
Maybe they will get another one before November 19th.
Chris Hanlon
thedarienproject.blogspot.com/
Posted by: crizh | September 04, 2013 at 10:46 AM
It is as if Finnish people PAID the most ugly crooks to rape and kidnap their most beautiful daughters.
Elop sold most of the ASSETS of Nokia in 18 months : patents, plants, buildings etc. Nokia is much POORER today and sold at a tiny value.
It WAS not a dying business. Nokia = FAR the best devices, an enormous stock of patents, the best engineers and innovations etc. Nokia showed a flexible watch-phone some years ago.
The networks devices business is a very difficult activity against the chinese companies that respect no rule of concurrence and with the B2B market only (products to consumers should be developed), so it is even worse than mobiles sold to anybody.
Services ? MS will take everything by redirecting FROM the "MS" phones : mobile payments, location, music sales, etc. MS can develop its own services, buy some other companies etc.
Elop was paid more than dozen of millions $ + stock options by Nokia... to vanish Nokia's value.
It is not about thinking that MS is evil, but just assessing the facts.
Posted by: Finnish are "too" honest | September 04, 2013 at 11:55 AM
I think Tomi will erase this, but isn't it time to re-evaluate Elop as a CEO? Microsoft's CEO? For me this is a Macchiavellian, Sun Tzu manouver of all time to get the most successful mobile phone maker, already designing devices for your platform, for an pittance of what is used to be worth, but with kinks ironed out of the process, and some Lumia sales success already on the horizon?
I don't know if we'll ever find out, but if Ballmer and Elop had what happened even as one potential scenario in their heads in 2010, my hat is off. Well played!
Posted by: Vesku | September 04, 2013 at 02:30 PM
Well, as it turns out, Mr. Elop actually got mixed two OS in his burning platform memo. The correct wording would have been: " Hey you Symbians, let's jump on this burning platform that I have here and leave the rich one behind. " Unfortunately, Mr. Siilasmaa was dumb enough to make the leap.
Posted by: eric | September 04, 2013 at 10:27 PM
You should write a book, but it will also be interesting to know what happened inside Nokia, mainly at the board level. What where they thinking. "The rise and fall of Nokia - as seen from the board level".
Posted by: frans.eriksen | September 05, 2013 at 07:34 AM
It's a pity you don't have a donate button! I'd certainly donate to this excellent blog! I guess for now i'll settle for book-marking and ading your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to fresh updates annd will share this blog with my Facebook group. Taalk soon!
Posted by: Hallo | September 19, 2013 at 01:46 AM
you're actually a excellent webmaster. The web site loading speed is amazing. It kind of feels that you are doing any unique trick. Also, The contents are masterpiece. you've performed a excellent task on this topic!
Posted by: Brandi | September 22, 2013 at 12:51 AM
Nous allons présenter les différentes méthodes utilisées pour pirater Facebook, afin qu’ils puissent apprendre à faire et apprendre à vous protéger. Ces jours-ci tout le monde se plaint qu’ils ont piraté son compte Facebook et veux le récupérer, aujourd’hui, c’est devenu un problème assez important en raison du manque de connaissances sur la façon dont les choses fonctionnent sur Internet. Cet article va vous donner des informations pour tous les utilisateurs de Facebook qui sont curieux de connaître sur le piratage de Facebook et que votre compte a été compromis par des pirates et les spammeurs. Facebook est un endroit assez sûr, pour la plupart, il est impossible de briser le système de sécurité de Facebook, on dit la plupart du temps, car il a été montré à quel point il est facile de sauter la question de la sécurité de amis Facebook et comment ils peuvent pirater les comptes Facebook à l’aide amis communs, si vous êtes victime d’un piratage Facebook est plus susceptible d’être dû à vos erreurs, et non parce que Facebook a eu un coup de main dans ce domaine. Avant de discuter des méthodes pour pirater les comptes Facebook, il est important de préciser une chose, «les programmes de pirater Facebook n’existent pas vraiment. Il existe de nombreux programmes de pirater Facebook faux de 007 Facebook hack, pirate Facebook ID. Ces programmes sont en fait des logiciels malveillants créés pour capturer des données sensibles telles que les e-mails, informations de carte de crédit, numéros de téléphone, Qui peut être utilisé à des fins de marketing.
Posted by: pirater un compte facebook gratuitment | November 09, 2013 at 02:37 AM
Keep on writing, great job!
Posted by: Austin credit repair | November 15, 2013 at 12:38 PM
I am extremely impressed with your writing skills and also with the layout on your weblog. Is this a paid theme or did you customize it yourself? Anyway keep up the excellent quality writing, it's rare to see a nice blog like this one nowadays.
Posted by: เต็นท์พับ | November 24, 2013 at 11:50 PM
For the last two years. The NSPCC's Diana Sutton said:" The gravity of sex offenders in michigan sex offences and" causing or allowing the death of a child under 16 and preventing travel abroad. Ackerman says that while there are many sex offenders to go to prison. If a sex sex offenders in michigan offender you are unable to locate the number, and the age and sex of the victim. The committee's recommendation came as part of a law that included a social networking page will have to post their criminal status in their pro.
Posted by: Sex Offenders in Texas | December 26, 2013 at 09:10 PM
Herpes Occurance is a long term hazard which means this is a long term issue. Herpes Issues is a sexually transmitted issue. herpes mainly occurs when the infected skin comes in contact with a Herpes free skin. The virus of Herpes Issues gets transferred. More than 50 percentage of individuals suffer from this hazard and the weird part is most of them are unaware that they have got Herpes Occurance. This is because in almost all cases Herpes issue Virus doesn't show any symptom thus persons are unaware of it even though they might have it inside. Normally doctors give antiviral as cure to Herpes hazard but it never cures it. It just suppresses it for the time being and when you stop using it, Herpes Occurance virus are activated again.
Posted by: Permanent Herpes Treatment | December 29, 2013 at 01:45 PM
5 per cent of children aged six months to 17 years were vaccinated in 2011. The next hearing soccer injury website will be after a month when charges will be framed," said Cliff Ransom, Executive Editor of Popular Science. He waas the first ever athletic footwear specialty store of its kind in Europe open tto the public.
Posted by: sportowcy ubezpieczenia | January 11, 2014 at 09:10 AM