So we have today seen the relaunch of Nokia Lumia now with Windows Phone 8 operating system. Nokia was already failing catastrophically with the first generation Lumia and then Microsoft decided to not allow those first Lumia handsets to be upgraded to Windows Phone 8. So now its back to zero and starting once again from scratch.
Note - two updates to this story one day later. A Nokia promotion video had been 'faked' without acknowledgement, ie they used other camera gear to create simulation of what Lumia 920 'Pureview' videos could look like. Nokia apologized for this. And also, Nokia has said they miscommunicated the 7 milllion sales number (as I said, it seemed too small a number).
I wrote last year about this time my first gut feelings about how the first generation Lumia would fare in the market. Later I also gave my considered view of what all was wrong. I ended up being remarkably accurate on how utterly the first generation Lumia series would fail inspite of the hype pushed by Nokia and Microsoft. Remember all that? That supposedly Windows Phone was outselling the iPhone in the UK (remember that, Nokia people saying UK customers were tired of the iPhone???) and that the AT&T sales was very strong (it wasn't, didn't even hit 600,000 in a quarter) and that Windows Phone was outselling the iPhone in China (where in reality iPhone outsold all Nokia smartphones running Windows, Symbian and Meego combined by 3 to 2).
The Microsoft Way of trying to distort reality is to push misinformation, misleading comments and even downright lies to try to create hype. This is all part of the standard dirty tricks by Microsoft that Nokia's CEO Stephen Elop, an ex-Microsoft exec is eager to emulate. And now we hear again, at the New York event launching the new Lumia's today, according to live blogging by Gizmodo, that "Elop says China quickly becoming largest WP market in the world." Yeah. And I am quickly becoming a teenage girl from Japan named Tomi haha.. But lets look at those China sales a bit later. Lets start with these new Lumia smartphones. How did Nokia's Lumia Relaunch succeed today? I call it simply: Failure Version 2.0.
SPECS AS FLAGSHIP
So we get two new Lumia smartphones by Nokia that run Windows Phone 8 (the four older Lumia models are now totally obsoleted, 'Osborned' in fact, as they are not compatible and cannot be upgraded from Windows Phone 7.5 to 8.0). Understand what it means. It does not mean that Nokia has now expanded from 4 to 6 Lumia models - where we might think Nokia grows sales say from 4 million last quarter to 6 million soon. No. Rather, Nokia has regressed from 4 to 2 marketable Lumia models. This cannot help Nokia grow, this is likely to produce a Nokia sales regression, dimishing versus this year Q2 when Nokia managed 4 million total Lumia sales (vs other Nokia smartphones of over 6 million, vs Blackberry sales of 8 million, HTC sales of 9 million, iPhone sales of 26 million and Samsung smartphone sales of 50 million in the same Q2. 18 months ago, before this Windows strategy was announced, Nokia had seen dramatically growing smartphone sales powered by Symbian, that produced 28 million sales per quarter).
But lets start on the positive, shall we? Yes, there is obviously a lot of development, these new Windows Phone 8 based Nokia Lumia smartphones are - yes they are - better than the previous Lumias. Unfortunately, in many areas, these Christmas-2012 period smartphones are only trying to catch up to tech specs that Nokia has been selling on its other Symbian and MeeGo operating systems many years ago, so while yes, these often are improvements, they are not exactly cutting-edge tech, for the most part. There are some goodies though. So lets do the specs. I will compare the new flagship Lumia 920 to the previous year-old flagship Windows based Lumia 800, the year-old MeeGo based N9, and the two-year old Symbian-based flagship N8, so you can see how the specs compare:
FLAGSHIP COMPARISON (all handsets similar form-factor of touch-screen slate)
Feature . . . . Lumia 920 . . Lumia 800 . . N9 (MeeGo) . . N8 (Symbian)
Year . . . . . . 2012 Q4 . . . 2011 Q4 . . . 2011 Q3 . . . . 2010 Q4
OS . . . . . . . WP 8 . . . . . WP 7.5 . . . . MeeGo . . . . . . Symbian
Screen . . . . 4.5". . . . . . . 3.7". . . . . . . 3.9" . . . . . . . . 3.5"
Memory . . . . 32 GB . . . .. 16 GB . . . . . 64 GB . . . . . . 16 GB
MicroSD . . . no . . . . . . . . no . . . . . . . no . . . . . . . . . yes
Camera . . . . 8mp . . . . . . . 8mp . . . . . . 8mp . . . . . . . 12mp
Flash . . . . . LED . . . . . . . LED . . . . . . LED . . . . . . . Xenon ('real' flash)
Second cam . yes . . . . . . . no . . . . . . . yes . . . . . . . . yes
LTE . . . . . . . yes . . . . . . . no . . . . . . . . no . . . . . . . . no
NFC. . . . . . . yes . . . . . . . no . . . . . . . . yes . . . . . . . no
Video out . . . no . . . . . . . . no . . . . . . . . yes . . . . . . . yes
Qi* . . . . . . . yes . . . . . . . no . . . . . . . . no . . . . . . . . no
(Qi is standard for wireless charging)
Note, most other specs are same or similar ie all have GPS, WiFi, FM Radio, and the handsets are roughly similar in size and appearance.
So how does this compare? The screen size for the Lumia 920 is big and very sharp. That is good. Its nothing like the biggest screen by rivals, but it is big and far bigger than past Nokia flagships. Yes, the Lumia 920 adds wireless charging (again not a Nokia unique benefit but is definitely hot tech now). But after those, look at where the Lumia 920 is only catching up to past Nokia on Symbian or MeeGo. The second camera and NFC are aspects Nokia flagships have had in the past but the lame Lumia 800 for last Christmas did not. So this is only catching up.
Then on the memory, 32 GB is better than what the Lumia 800 had (16 MB) but pales compared to last year's N9 (64 GB) and the N8 had expandable memory via microSD cards.
But on major tech aspects that past Nokia flagships have had, that this latest Lumia 920 still can't match include: 12 mp camera, real Xenon flash and video-out, aspects Nokia had two years ago in the flagship (and many rivals have today or have even better, and other Nokia phones have since like the 808 Pureview running Symbian this year).
So we have definitely improvements in the new Lumia flagship for Christmas-sales 2012 vs last year, but this latest-and-greatest Windows Phone Lumia 920 flagship still fails and disappoints on many major Nokia specs of its recent past flagships (memory, microSD, 12mp camera, Xenon flash, video-out). For a smartphone maker who invests heavily on the camera side - including an exclusive partnership with camera lensmakers Carl Zeiss, this is crazy stuff. In fact Nokia has sold 8mp cameras four years ago on its flagships. HTC has been selling 16mp cameras last year and Nokia introduced the monster-camera at 41mp on its 808 Pureview this year (running Symbian obviously).
Will the Lumia 920 seem better in a store than the past four Lumia handsets? Yes. Is this a competitor worthy of top flagship for Christmas 2012 and into Spring 2013 smartphone sales? No. Absolutely not. This is a mid-range premium smartphone by specs, not a superphone. Nokia could do (and has done) far better than this (if it used more capable operating systems like Symbian or MeeGo).
If you compare the Lumia 920 to the past, it may seem competitive. But in a week we'll see the iPhone 5. Before Christmas we'll likely see more updated Galaxy models from Samsung and hot new rivals from Sony, HTC, LG, Motorola etc. This is not competitive enough as a flagship smartphone.
SPECS VS 2012 NOKIA
FLAGSHIP COMPARISON (all handsets similar form-factor of touch-screen slate)
Feature . . . . Lumia 920 . . Lumia 900 . . N9 (MeeGo) . . 808 Pureview (Symbian)
Year . . . . . . 2012 . . . . . . 2012 . . . . . . 2011 . . . . . . . 2012
OS . . . . . . . WP 8 . . . . . WP 7.5 . . . . MeeGo . . . . . . Symbian
Screen . . . . 4.5". . . . . . . 4.3". . . . . . . 3.9" . . . . . . . . 4.0"
Memory . . . . 32 GB . . . .. 16 GB . . . . . 64 GB . . . . . . 16 GB
MicroSD . . . no . . . . . . . . no . . . . . . . no . . . . . . . . . yes
Camera . . . . 8mp . . . . . . . 8mp . . . . . . 8mp . . . . . . . 41mp
Flash . . . . . LED . . . . . . . LED . . . . . . LED . . . . . . . Xenon ('real' flash)
Second cam . yes . . . . . . . yes . . . . . . . yes . . . . . . . yes
LTE . . . . . . . yes . . . . . . . yes . . . . . . . no . . . . . . . . no
NFC. . . . . . . yes . . . . . . . no . . . . . . . . yes . . . . . . . yes
Video out . . . no . . . . . . . . no . . . . . . . . yes . . . . . . . yes
Qi* . . . . . . . yes . . . . . . . no . . . . . . . . no . . . . . . . . no
(Qi is standard for wireless charging)
Again, same story. Compared to the Lumia 900 from this year, the new Lumia 920 does move up many aspects and seems a big upgrade. But just compared to the two other top phones sold this year by Nokia, the 808 Pureview on Symbian and last year's N9 on MeeGo, the newest Lumia 920 only matches many aspects and falls short on many more (memory of 64GB, microSD support, camera resolution of 41mp, real Xenon flash, video out).
This could have been a contender. This could even have been a true challenger. But now, seriously, if an average salesrep looks at those specs, and remembers how the current and recent past Nokia smartphones have been in their specs, this is not a 'wow' factor smartphone. As this is the flagship from the Lumia series, it will be compared to the iPhone 5 and Samsung Note and Galaxy S3 and whatever new funky stuff will come for Christmas.
COOL SOFTWARE
So, you thought that Nokia and Windows software show was somehow cool? City Lens? Yeah, nice AR application for Windows Phone, but its just what..... 3 YEARS behind the AR apps we've seen on Androids for example and that 'obsolete' OS called Symbian.. Mapping, navigation, please.. 100,000 apps in the Windows Phone ecosystem - is only now catching up to that 'obsolete' ecosystem of Ovi Store and Symbian - which by the way had far more carrier billing support and a 20x bigger addressable market size so if you are an app developer and want to earn millions, rather than thousands, you should sell to Symbian/Ovi not Windows Phone - this before we zero the installed base now with Windows Phone 8 once again. And yes, some people do buy smartphones because of their apps, but come on, iPhone and Android have 500,000 apps each. Its not even close!
If you are like most consumers - and like the Nokia research itself revealed about Nokia smartphone users this Spring - then the camera is your number 1 priority on a smartphone and Nokia's Lumia 920 fails you, at least compared to past flagships by Nokia. If you are like many heavily addicted consumers of smartphones, youth, business users, young adults etc - Facebooking, Twittering, SMS texting and emailing - then the lack of QWERTY will drive you to rival smarpthones. If you are truly after those apps, then you go for an iPhone or Android. Why would anyone bother to buy this lame compromise.
SO ITS TWO MORE FAILED i-PHON-A-CLONES
So, what do we now have? So far Elop has brought us six new Lumia devices. Each of them is a similar i-Phon-a-Clone - very very similar form factor close clones of the iPhone. Why? We know that only 38% of all smartphones sold now are touch-screen smartphones (which includes hybrids), according to latest Q2 stats by Deloitte. So 62% of smartphones are non-touch screen smartphones (includes non-touch screen style QWERTY based smartphones like say a Blackberry or basic keypad smartphones). I am not suggesting NOT to do any touch screen on a Windows Phone based smartphone. I DO mean that Nokia HAS to introduce some QWERTY sliders into its portfolio. Six Lumia devices already, all made on the minority form factor and with not even one QWERTY-slider hybrid device amongst them all?
Note, this is a Nokia staple! This is what came from the Communicator line, and we saw in recent Nokia touch-screen hybrid smartphones like the N900 (on Maemo), the E7 (on Symbian) and the N950 (on MeeGo). These smartphones sell in massive numbers, especially outside of the USA where many heavily addicted smartphone users send 100 SMS text messages per day and often shift to OTT services like Whatsapp, Blackberry Messenger etc. Business users obviously appreciate a real keyboard for email uses whereas heavy Facebook and Twitter etc users on the consumer side are equally appreciative of the physical QWERTY keyboard.
I am NOT suggesting to make all Lumias QWERTY-sliders, but I DO suggest to make a couple of the series do this. ALL smartphone user surveys find that mobile messaging has more users than downloading apps, on all continents. This is a traditional Nokia competitive advantage. Elop is throwing it away with these iPhon-a-Clones.
WHERE IS LOW END?
And so we see a top-end flagship in the Lumia 920 and a mid-price 820? This makes sense why? The majority of smartphones are low-cost smartphones! 41% of all smartphones sold this year will cost under 100 Dollars (price without contract ie without handset subsidy - note the real price of an iPhone 4S is 650 dollars, not the nominal 179 dollars that it might be sold with 2 year contract). The Lumia 610 was aiming towards the lower end of mid-priced smartphones while not coming anywhere near the 100 dollar level. Now we have a far more expensive second Lumia? Why? Why why why why why?
This is as stupid as Henry Ford, being asked to give a Model T Ford automobile in some other color than black, and he then offering the choice of dark grey!!! Elop is an idiot! So he now offers a lame flagship rival to the iPhone 4S and clearly a slightly lesser rival to what, the iPhone 4? In an era when we are about to see the iPhone 5. Whereas Apple itself refuses to offer the world a QWERTY variant of the iPhone - a market Nokia should own and Apple refuses to give us a lower-cost 'iPhone Nano' which is where something like a Lumia 610-priced lower-end device would fit. But no. Elop is incompetent!
Last year this time Nokia announced 2 Lumia smartphones for Christmas, the Lumia 800 and 710. They managed 600,000 total sales in that quarter. This time the Lumia 920 and 820 are aimed even higher on the price range, they won't thus gain scale from lower prices (while that is where the market size is expanding massively this year). So at its peak, with 4 Lumia models this past Q2, Nokia was able to sell 4 million Windows Phone based smartphones. At the launch of the series, in the first quarter, Nokia sold 600,000 units. That is immediately a window for you to consider the scope. Thus with two models now, the scale of expectation of Christmas sales would be in the range of 600,000 to 2 million. Do you think that is 'a success' by any definition? Incidentially, in Q1 of this year, Nokia Lumia series did exactly that, 2 million sales.
What would 2 million Lumia sales mean in Q4 of 2012? Roughly 1%.. Yes. One percent! The latest quarter we just got results for, Nokia Lumia still managed to sell 3% of all smartphones. Symbian, yes, the 'obsolete' and 'Burning Platforms' Symbian based Nokia smartphones outsold all Lumia Windows Phone smartphones by Nokia by a ratio of about 3 to 2. This while Nokia's own marketing admits they were unable to satisfy the heavy demand of the 808 Pureview (yes, Symbian-based 808 Pureview) in many markets.
Nokia owned the smartphone market when Elop took over and 18 months ago Nokia sold more than Apple and Samsung - combined! Nokia was more than twice the size of its nearest rival !!! During the year 2010, Nokia grew more in new unit sales of smartphones than Apple's iPhone!!! Yes, Nokia, that 'Burning Platforms' Nokia - with Symbian - grew more than Apple's iPhone, the tech darling (and far more than Samsung or Blackberry). Nokia did this all profitably, in fact for Q4 of 2010, Nokia's Symbian-based smartphone unit set a Nokia record in profits. Nokia's market share in smartphones was 29% when the Windows partnership was announced. Now, after total self-destruction of the Nokia smartphone market by Nokia's own CEO and his 'partner' Microsoft, Nokia's new strategic direction, the Windows Phone based Lumia, is headed to what? About 1% market share for Q4 of 2012? This is madness!
Good thing we still have Symbian (and MeeGo) and Nokia can still sell some other smartphones. But I do think Nokia's Christmas quarter 2012 smartphone market share will be between 2% and 3% when counting all smartphone operating systems, Symbian, Windows and MeeGo, combined. This unit will be ridiculously unprofitble at this level of collapse and obviously, more profit warnings will come, as will - unfortunately - ever more layoffs by Nokia management as it attempts to adjust to the continuously collapsing sales.
ELOP TALKS CHINA
So, then what was this madness that Elop said today in New York? I mentioned the Gizmodo live blog which wrote the Elop statement like this "Elop says China quickly becoming largest WP market in the world." - This may be misquoted or mis-stated, note I have not seen anyone else livetweet this or quote Elop from New York (yet) making that statement. And it is not a verbatim quote of Elop, that is my direct quote of how Gizmodo reported it. But there is no reason to question Gizmodo's live tweeting. If Elop did make this claim, this is bullshit at the batshit-crazy level.
I wrote my very deep analysis of why it is NOT POSSIBLE for Windows Phone to be selling particularly well in China right now. You can go read that analysis if you need the evidence. Suffice it to quote latest Canalys statistics for Q2 which find China market at 81% Android, 9% iOS, and Nokia only with 6%. In China Nokia has long-standing carrier relationships with the two biggest carriers, China Mobile and China Unicom, who sell Symbian and MeeGo based smartphones. Only the smallest Chinese carrier, China Telecom has even accepted the Lumia into its offering (and also sells the other operating systems too). So its definitely certain that Lumia cannot sell more than one sixth of that 6%. If you think somehow 1% of China is Nokia's best market, when Lumia global market share was 3%, then you are mathematically challenged. This is physically not possible. Elop is lying - if that is what he said in New York today.
UPDATE - this next item has now been updated and corrected by Nokia, as their miscommunication. The 7 million was not cumulative up to now, it was cumulative up to about end of June. I am striking over my original text so you can still read it if you want, but this section is now no longer relevant. It was - as I suggested - not the real number as reported.
LUMIA ONLY CUMULATIVELY 7 MILLION?
Then we have yet another bizarre statistic just out this week from Nokia. They said that Nokia had sold a cumulative 7 million Lumia smartphones since launch last year. That might on the very surface of it seem like a nice number, until you understand this. We know from previous Nokia statements that it sold 600K in Q4 of last year, 2M in Q1, and then 4M in Q2. That means only 400,000 total units sold of Lumia in the first two months of Q3 !!!! Wot ?? Lets put this into a table:
Period . . . . Lumia sales . . . Lumia sales per month
Q4 2011 . . . . 600,000 . . . . . 300,000
Q1 2012 . . . 2,000,000 . . . . . 667,000
Q2 2012 . . . 4,000,000 . . . . 1,333,000
Q3 2012 . . . . 400,000 . . . . . . 200,000
TOTAL . . . . 7,000,000
The statement is official Nokia, and cumulative to this week, ie end of August. Since 6.6 million Lumia were sold by the end of Q2 of 2012, that means that since the Osborning of the Lumia series by Microsoft, the Lumia sales have truly collapsed and are at near-nothing level. We did hear that carriers have pulled Lumia from the shelves, Europe's T-Mobile Germany for example cancelled its Lumia 900 launch altogether and stores such as Walmart have the Lumia 900 in discount bins selling for 0.97 dollars (yes, 97 cents) with contract.
I am skeptical of that level. I am sure we'll hear the latest Lumia quarterly sales level in the Nokia Q3 results in late October, and there is still one month of September to sell. I was expecting something like 2 million or so, at vastly discounted price-dumping levels, but if the sales have fallen to this catastrophic level now, it means the Lumia brand is severely tarnished too.
PUREVIEW BRAND DAMAGE
I do have to say that Elop is destroying yet another Nokia brand - now the Pureview brand. The 808 Pureview camera, with the 41 mp camera - had its 'party piece' as the supreme trick, that astonishing zooming ability into supersharp pictures, as the image was taken in 41mp resolution, but pictures usually then selected as a 'crop' of that original image. So if you wanted an 8mp picture, you could select and edit exactly what parts you wanted, which still would be supersharp. The camera sensor resolution and size is a critical element to the most obvious, visible and most-used part of the Pureview experience. Now by branding some low-light and other imaging gimmicks as supposedly 'Pureview' Elop is ruining the Pureview branding. But this is also par for the course, Elop has no interest in preserving any Nokia properties for the future, he burns them all in his bonfire of platforms.
UPDATE - MARKETING COMMUNICATION DISASTERS
(This part to the blog is added one day later). So we now know that Nokia messed up its marketing communications realted to the relaunch of Lumia. This is totally inexcusable, as this date was known well in advance and the importance of this launch was so great. But yes, first, Nokia was caught falsifying its video and had to apologize. Secondly, the released Lumia sales numbers were completely misleading. How can Nokia be doing this now? I think it tells of a confused and disrupted marketing communications department, where most veterans have been fired or have left out of their own initiative, and the recently hired marketing people are either not competent to do their jobs, or are overworked and overstressed. This is to be expected when Nokia keeps cutting staff so deeply - but the fastest way to discover such major systematic problems would be in the marketing communications department, because they work on such a short time frame. It is very likely that Nokia is also suffering from many other similar internal problems in everything from product development to production to shipments to partnership management etc and those problems will only appear as equally embarrassing problems weeks and months from now. But this is very serious messing-up of Nokia's most important launch date of this year. I would not be surprised if over the next few days we discover other problems related to this specific launch, that are still bubbling under the radar.. Nonetheless, clearly Nokia has lost the talent and deeply insightful professional skills to catch these kinds of errors, and now the new marketing communciations team that Elop has, is far less focused on sticking to the truth, honestly and accurately. I think this is yet another sign of problems long-run with Nokia management.
CARRIER SUPPORT
So, the one other rumor was that perhaps Verizon would be announced as a new Nokia carrier partner. Now, first, please remember that before AT&T started to sell Nokia Lumia smartphones, Nokia's North American sales were 600,000 total mobile phone handsets per quarter. Now after AT&T started to sell Lumia, with the biggest new phone launch marketing campaign AT&T had ever created - supported by the biggest handset launch budget Nokia had ever done - in fact 3x bigger - and supported by massive MIcrosoft budgets too - the resulting total North American sales of Nokia mobile phones were.. 600,000 units this past quarter. Zero gain. That was before the Lumia was Osborned. Now AT&T has effectively stopped selling Lumia. So if there had been a big Verizon announcement (or a big China Mobile announcement for example) then maybe - just maybe - we might have some optimism for Lumia gains for Christmas.
Instead, what did we learn? We learned that Nokia Lumia series has 13 systematic faults why it fails in all markets including the USA. We learned that the Lumia series has 101 faults when used by loyal Nokia smartphone owners (now with more Lumia! upgraded to 121 faults, get yours today!). And what does that mean? It means that the Lumia series has the biggest return rates of any Nokia smartphone ever released. The stores refuse to sell the Lumia. The very latest Kantar statistics now in August 2012 tell us that for every 5 existing Nokia Symbian customers in Europe, 4 will rather buy any rival smartphone than take the Lumia. And that the independent survey of Lumia owners by Yankee Group found that of Lumia owners in the USA, 4 out of 10 rate the Lumia as literally the worst phone possible (rating it a 1 out of 5 where 1 is worst and 5 is best).
If you thought that Lumia and Windows Phone will somehow 'save' Nokia, that myth was exposed first on this blog last year, and the evidence is now overwhelming. I have now taken my first look at Elop's attempt at Lumia version 2.0. This is not good enough, either. This will be failure 2.0. When Elop started, he traded 29% of Nokia Symbian market share for 7% with Symbian and Windows Phone. Now we start from zero again. Now we don't get to re-set to 29%. We start from 7%. And if the same math holds, then a year from now Nokia's smartphone share will be 1.7%.. If we want to be generous, we may see twice that, call it 3.4% or if you want to be very negative, take half of that, at 0.8%. But even then, Nokia Lumia will be the biggest remaining Windows Phone maker, and total Windows Phone market share will not be over 4%, more likely close to 2% a year from now. That is hardly a 'third ecosystem'. This is a path to certain death. Elop has to be fired and this suicidal Windows path has to be abandoned. Nokia now needs to prepare to join Android (or Tizen) as Windows cannot save Nokia. And obviously I am expecting Nokia to be sold and split up into parts.
PS those who need more info on smartphones, their specs, form factors, market shares, etc see my TomiAhonen Phone Book.
Regarding the fake photos and videos with Lumia 920. These are as intentional they ever could be and that people would find out was part of the plan. The plan is to destroy the Nokia brand so that Microsoft can buy parts of it. Do you really think that anyone would slip through such "mistake" by accident.
Posted by: AtTheBottomOfTheHilton | September 06, 2012 at 03:30 PM
Looks like the PureView tech might just be all hype after all. In the promotional video, the shots supposedly from the PureView are actually from a RED camera
http://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/zfdui/nokias_video_promoting_their_new_pureview/
http://www.reddit.com/r/funny/comments/zew18/gee_that_nokia_phone_hes_filming_with_seems/
Posted by: kumbatero | September 06, 2012 at 03:31 PM
The Nokia situation yields a simple fact (Occam's razor) NO ONE WANTS WINDOWS on their phone!
Posted by: John Waclawsky | September 06, 2012 at 07:25 PM
Next week with the IPhone 5 presentation all of this will be forgotten !!
:-)
Posted by: EmmanuelM | September 06, 2012 at 08:27 PM
The camera has standard 8mpix censor, but in addition to OIS it also promises F2.0 aperture. I can confirm that it takes pretty good photos in moderately low light environment.
Flash is something that no photographer want's to use, as it usually does more harm than good (with exceptions, of course).
And one comment directly to Tomi. Stephen Elop is a CEO - a hired hand at Nokia. He does not make the strategy. That's the job for the Board. So the Board has decided to go with Microsoft, so it is pretty natural that they choose a Microsoftee for the job. Elop is also forced to do a lot of nasty change management, as in this new mode of working (MS OS + QCOM chips) you need heck of a less workforce that Nokia carried (and carries).
So he is doing the best he can, in the given strategy framework. Sure, there has been mistakes, like downplaying Symbian. Then again, the WP app market boomed immediately after Nokia's 11/2 announcement.
Also note that only TWO smartphone vendors are doing good these days: Apple and Samsung. Totally different approaches. Samsung as a multi-industry vendor and component manufacturer has economics of scale to die for. Apple keeps riding on it's iconic brand. Apparently rest of the CEOs are incompetent morons?
On a different path Nokia's decline would have been slower, but I have the gut feeling that certainty of death would have been higher than today. Symbian, Meego - Nokia's in house SW RnD was just not cutting it.
All that Nokia can do now is to roll out as good WP devices as it can and hope that WP8 builds traction from the PC synergies. Based on some fresh leaks, more devices would be soon following.
I kind of like that at least they are all-in on what they are doing. It's WP or nothing. Lets imagine that WP can get a 10-15% foothold of the market, and Nokia is the leading WP device vendor. Is that enough to make decent profit with the downsized corporate structure?
Posted by: Leading Analyst | September 06, 2012 at 08:56 PM
Nokia use to stand for integrity, social and corporate responsibility.... elop purefaked the new lumias, faked video, faked stills. This totally destroys nokia's brand as a leader in digital imagery. Damien Dennis 5years of work on the 808 pureview has been turned into a burning platform.
Posted by: ejvictor | September 06, 2012 at 09:53 PM
http://www.gsmarena.com/nokia_lumia_920_sample_images_found_to_be_fake_as_well-news-4769.php
Nokia also fakes the photo.... LOL
Posted by: cycnus | September 07, 2012 at 02:21 AM
Tomi,
about the number.... the 7 million lumia phone sold...
I think nokia have too much lie to fabricate THE success story of lumia.
at the end, they just don't know to put WHAT number in their accounting book.
Posted by: cycnus | September 07, 2012 at 02:24 AM
Lumia 920:
True Nokia Engineering and Consumer Friendliness in action:
1. pureview - floating lens - beautiful non-blurred photos, non-flicky video
- awesome
2. pureview - more exposure time without blur - beautiful photos even at night without flash
- awesome
3. city lens - augmented reality
- awesome
4. better than google maps,directions,traffic - supplier to amazon kindles
- awesome
5. Qi - wireless charging - initiatives & partnerships
- awesome
6. WP8 - live tiles - shared core kernel with all win devices
- awesome
7. skydrive - cloud based storage - outlook
8. music unplugged - no registration, no nonsense free & great music
- awesome
9. WP8 - IE10
- awesome
10. Nokia Exclusive WP App Collection
- awesome
WOW WOW WOW
Posted by: vijay | September 07, 2012 at 04:27 AM
Here an interesting note on the presentation of the Lumia920 etc.., WP8 and its shortcomings: http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2012/09/where-oh-where-is-windows-phone-8/?comments=1#comments-bar
Posted by: Rino | September 07, 2012 at 04:54 AM
Don't agree with your comments about China. The thing you have to recognise is that most phones here are sold unlocked and contract-free - most people don't really go for the free-on-contract model that's common in Europe or the US. Perhaps only 10% of phones are sold through the carrier. So Lumina's potential market isn't restricted to 20% of the market like you think, it's restricted to 90% plus 20%-of-10%.
Also, you see quite a few people using Windows Phones here - not anything like as many as iPhone or Android, but Elop didn't compare sales in China to competitors, only to other markets. I can totally believe the claim that "Windows Phone is less unpopular in China than it is anywhere else".
Posted by: Kevin P | September 07, 2012 at 05:24 AM
Although Nokia Lumia Relaunched with Windows Phone 8 is a very excellent smartphone, but it lacks the innovation.
Posted by: Busy Sylvia | September 07, 2012 at 07:01 AM
I am sure that the "osbourned" Lumia range will sell better in Q3 than what it did in Q2.
Tomi, am willing to bet a bottle of Koskenkova with you on that one.
Posted by: Timo | September 07, 2012 at 07:48 AM
Elop should play for HIFK
Posted by: jukka lundgren | September 07, 2012 at 08:59 AM
Did anyone watch the interview that Elop did with Engadget? He said that "we are really looking forward to windows 8 and windows phone 8 coming out". I know its not the most henious thing to say but as the CEO of Nokia I really don't think he should be saying that about the desktop software. Windows (PC) is irrelevant unless he's going to try start flogging tablets too.
Even if entirely innocent it makes you think ill of his intentions and loyalty.
Posted by: Michael Cox | September 07, 2012 at 02:43 PM
I think there is some points that do require attention:
- Because of OIS and used optics in Lumia 920 camera will beat Nokia 808 camera (and any other camera-phones) in low light condition (in theory). I believe Lumia 920 camera fits fairly well to pureview brand. Like with point ant shoot cameras there are different tools for different conditions, some with super-zoom and some suited for street photography in low light conditions. It's the same with pureview cameras. The technology is solid, but unfortunately Nokia fails when marking that technology (with Lumia 920).
- Lumia/WP has a well working Skydrive integration, so microSD support is not actually not that critical, but still, some may need it.
- "Lumia series has 101 faults" has been debunked many time, but true there are some issues (but only a handful) that may or may not affect on usability... but they hardly a actual show stopper with WP. So I wonder, why to distribute FUD about this? It already has started to diminish otherwise good blog.
Posted by: nota | September 07, 2012 at 03:03 PM
@nota
Lumia camera beating 808? Only in the inverse universe.
See it that way: Why do you think they had to shot the Lumia Poorview images and pictures with something else then the Lumia Poorview? Because the quality of Lumia Poorview especially in high resolution is very bad.
Pureview is about quality and as was proven by Nokia itself Lumia is not up to that task. This is the message, the prove, the demonstration given by Nokia itself. This is not Pureview, its Poorview.
Also Nokia demonstrated that the Lumia Poorview does especially bad with low light and in street conditions since that was the motive of the faked image/video campain. It doesn't become more clear then that that Lumia Poorview plays in a different liga, the amateur-club, then 808 profi cam.
Your believe that Skydrive replaces local and integrated storage is crazy. That is like arguing 512kb RAM are enough cause combined with skydrive you have terrabytes of RAM. Also why skydrive? Why not an external tumemachine like device you have at home and that connects with bluetooth? Maybe because theb Microsoft has no access to your data? Yeah, alright. Thanks but no thanks.
Posted by: Spawn | September 07, 2012 at 09:14 PM
Tomi , newer Nokia Lumia phones dont have FM radio. This could be first for top end Nokias in many years.
Posted by: sid | September 08, 2012 at 10:13 AM
guys this is off topic can you please support these petitions
one to fire elop
http://www.change.org/petitions/nokia-board-fire-stephen-elop#
and one for skype video call on n9
Posted by: steve | September 08, 2012 at 01:13 PM
http://www.change.org/petitions/skype-skype-video-call-on-nokia-n9
Posted by: steve | September 08, 2012 at 01:14 PM