I have a question for you. How many times do we get to hear Nokia CEO Stephen Elop say "its more challenging than I had expected" and "the sales channel is not supporting our products" and "I can't give you a long term outlook" in reporting these profit warnings and every more disasterous Quarerly results, that his claim of "we are proceeding well along our strategy" starts to sound hollow. At what point does the CEO lose his credibility.
I think Elop lost his credibility yesterday. I will tell you why, and its that tired cliche of the Captain of the Titanic rearranging deck chairs while his ship is headed at the visible ice berg. But lets not go there yet. Lets first review what we now know that we did not know yesterday.
HUGE LAYOFFS
Nokia announced 10,000 layoffs. I am very sorry for my many Nokia colleagues and friends who are now involved or fear that they might be losing their jobs. 3,700 of the jobs will be lost in Finland, and announcing this right before Juhannus, the midsummer celebration and start of Finnish summer holiday season - recognizing, Nokia had not told the labor unions about these coming layoffs, so they now start the negotiations of how to fire 3,700. That means many of the people who do lose jobs, will find out when they come back from vacation. And how many is that? I think Nokia has about 15,000 people employed in Finland now, so it would be about one in four who will lose their jobs. Happy holidays indeed. What a cruel way to deliver the devastating news.
The layoffs will hit globally about 1 in 5 Nokia employees. Think about that. It means that as an average, everyone who works at Nokia will know very closely several people who will be fired. This will be a huge blow to the morale of those left at Nokia. And like someone mentioned at Twitter, this is very cruel at those who had listened to the new CEO last year in February, and took the jump with him, off the "burning" platform and into the icy waters. Now it looks like the CEO got out of the water, got himself a rifle, and starts to shoot into the water, to kill any Nokia employees he can find who hadn't drowned yet.
But the layoffs were totally expected. As Nokia's Q1 results were so horrid and the sales kept falling for five consecutive quarters since Elop's Burning Platforms memo (the costliest management memo of all time) of February 2011 - as the company total sales fall, and the company is already unprofitable, there have to be cuts. The easy cuts had been made already, now it means deep, painful cuts. And it looks like Elop thinks one in five Nokia still-remaining employees must be fired now, just for Nokia to continue on.
The layoffs may help some Nokia investors trust the stock price but I think these cuts are now far too deep, gone on far too long, cutting into the meat of what was left of the strong base of Nokia. There is no fat to trim. Nokia cannot cut itself into a winner. This is the wrong path. But I am not the CFO, I have not seen the internal numbers and it really isn't even the point. Lets get to the Captain and his actions.
END OF MELTEMI
But I want to mention one thing. The layoffs in some offices including closing Ulm in Germany means the end of the Meltemi project and the end of the Linux and open source dream at Nokia. Meltemi was the sister OS platform to MeeGo, as a Linux based smarpthone operating system, but designed for ultra low cost handsets, to help Nokia migrate from S40 and S30 based 'featurephones' to smartphones, in the under 40 Euro/50 US dollar price range. This is a price point where Windows Phone cannot reach. The license of Windows Phone is about half that alone haha.. Windows Phone (and Windows 8) is a huge resource hog (as Microsoft software is also traditionally) meaning the equivalent device, like a smartphone, will need more CPU power, more memory, more storage, more supplemental processors etc, to do the same task as more efficient software (like Android or Symbian or MeeGo).
Meltemi was to be the most efficient smartphone OS to allow very low cost components and minimal specs to make very low cost smartphones - for Africa, for India, for hte Emerging World. It was the project Mary McDowell was known for and until recently Elop seemed enthusiastically supportive of bringing smartphones to the Next Billion. Nokia's market share in smartphones in 2010 was over 80% in Africa, over 70% in China, over 60% in India and over 50% in Latin America. This was a very promising future for Nokia mid and long term viability.
That died yesterday. Linux was invented in Finland by Linus Torvalds, our Bill Gates of Finland so to speak. There is a huge programmer pool of talent around Linux in Finland and the open source philosophy is very strongly embraced by so many in the global tech space from esteemed tech gurus in mobile like Ajit Jaokar and Tony Fish (authors of Open Gardens on that very topic) to yes, the hacker community that is very vibrant for example in Finland. Nokia had a huge amount of good will out of its long-standing support of both open source and Linux. That died with the closings including Ulm (and the departure of Mary McDowell).
We heard of a new profit warning and a worsening of another profit warning. The previous profit warning for Q2 ie this current quarter, was that it should be about the same as the loss-making Q1 (-3%). Now we hear the losses will be worse (ie bigger losses than -3%). That is very bad news when the CEO told us in April that he thought Nokia was proceeding well with his strategy.
PROFIT WARNING
And then we heard the new profit warning. That now Nokia tells us that even Q3 will be unprofitable. And Nokia tells us that the handset unit is suffering and the profit margins in the smartphone unit are the worst-performing (this is where that 'proceeding well' part of the Elop strategy is centered, with Windows Phone powered Lumia smarpthones). And we heard - once again, that while Elop loves his Lumia phones, for some reason the retail channel is not selling them. Yeah. Big news big fella! Wasn't this the same thing you told us last year in April, and last year in June, and last August, and September, and this January, and this April? Wouldn' t it be about time you, the CEO did something about this chronic problem that is exactly the same every quarter - that Nokia retail channel is not selling your smartphones? Didn't you learn anything in the past what, 14 months?
We learned that Vertu the luxury mobile phone handset unit had been sold (it had been on the sales block since January at least, so this is not surprising news). What was surprising was the purchase of the - however it was phrased strangely - assets of the Swedish cameraphone imaging tech company. So this was a Nokia subcontractor already? And on a day you fire 10,000 people you say, oh, and I bought myself some new toys too. Isn't this just a little bit seeming like a cruel parent who is punishing his kids on Christmas? On the one hand on this day you fire thounsands and sell one of Nokia's 'crown jewels' and then you don't use any of that money to cure Nokia's troubles (in sales) you rather go buy some tech toys? And this from a vendor who already was a subcontractor? What? This was worthwhile effort of your time Mr Elop, or that of your senior staff, to go find someone to buy, with all the money you now save with the thousands you fire? I think your priorities are wrong, Mr Elop. But again, lets stick to the point. So what else? There were top management changes. Ok. Who and what?
MANAGEMENT CHANGES
Mary McDowell, Niklas Savander and Jerri DeVard will leave. Mary was in charge of the dumbphones unit of Nokia. Niklas was in charge of Markets. Both were long term veterans of senior Nokia management. Jerri was the Chief Marketing Officer, who joined a year ago to the top position and was former Microsoft colleague of Elop.
What can we read out of this? First, that now with Mary and Niklas, the exodus of top management talent in mobile handset wars has been expelled by Elop. The total Jorma Ollila collected Dream Team of the best mobile handset talent has fled or quit in protest or been fired. What did they know? They helped Nokia grow to take 40% of the global handset industry (profitably). They helped discover all the trends we now hold true and dear, that Nokia did first, like smartphones, cameraphones, gaming on phones, app stores, mobile banking, NFC, cloud computing, social networking, mobile advertisig etc. These were not always done best in execution - ie Nokia was notoriously slow to capitalize on those - but compared to Nokia's traditional full-portfolio handset makers, Motorola, Samsung, LG, SonyEricsson etc - Nokia was miles ahead of them.
And even compared to the pure-smarphone players like Apple, HTC, RIM, Nokia had been fighting very well in all those wars, with that Jorma Ollila assembled Dream Team. That train was run off its rails during the biggest economic crisis the world has seen in our lifetimes - that killed many Nokia rivals like Palm and Motorola - but Nokia never produced one loss-making quarter in its handset business during those hard times. Yes, the previous CEO Olli-Pekka Kallasvuo did make many mistakes and was duly fired for being a poor boss for Nokia, but this second tier of Nokia generals were among the best in the world. If Elop had been willing to keep them, listen to them, use their insights, we might be closer to the 40% in handsets and smarpthones, rather than 20% in handsets and 8% in smartphones were we are today. And definitely Nokia would still be profitable today..
Elop clearly makes amateur management mistakes (colossal ones like the Burning Platform memo but also enduring ones like his enthusiastic support of Skype last June, that angered so many of the global carrier community). If he was thinking of Nokia's best interest and trusted his mangement team, he would have listened, like how many of his team urged him to stay with MeeGo. But he rather clearly prefers to expell any strong voices and minds, and wants a feeble cardre of Yes Men to rubber stamp his dictatorial edicts.
ARBITRARY PUNISHMENT
So what of Jerri DeVard? This is the most bizarre. She came with him. She was an American to help change the 'too Finnish' Nokia. She was ex Microsoft and an Elop colleague. How could Elop hire her and give her the CMO job, if she was not qualified? Why was she fired/let go. I mean, the Lumia launch has been massive and global and visible, arguably oversaturated, not failed. Every story about Lumia launch countries was superbly impressed by how vividly the Lumia marketing was visible! Elop has said time and again that it is the sales retail channel that is refusing to sell Nokia smartphones. The problem in Lumia disappointing launch now is not a lack of marketing - gosh, they gave away free Xbox 360 videogaming consoles with Lumia purchases in the UK for example - they booked New York's Times Square for one of the most flashly launches with live music. What did she 'do wrong' if the problem is - repeatedly said by Elop - the problem is retail sales. That is not her job! That is the job of the head of sales, not the head of marketing. Did you walk into a handset store, Mr Elop, during the Spring as Lumia was launching? I did, from here in Hong Kong to the UK on the other side of the planet. Lumia was blasted everywhere. Giant floor-to-ceiling sized markeing materials. Lumia MARKETING was everywhere. The sales dudes and dudettes weren't selling Lumia, but the marketing was there!
So we now see what Elop does. He identifies, even in public, a clear problem. Then he takes decisive action. The brave CEO boldly fires someone! Elop knows where the problem was so he.. fires someone else. Michael Schumacher, you have caused a crash in this Monaco Grand Prix. We will punish.. Lewis Hamilton for it, he was in the pits changing his tyres and nowhere near the accident. This is 'sanity'. This is a 'fair' boss? He recruits you to join him in the new company, and then a year later fires you? For what? For the failures of the sales department that is not in your control! What a cruel boss.
HOW TO ANGER YOUR CUSTOMERS EVEN MORE
Then what of the new guys coming in? I really don't know anything about Timo Toikkanen, Tuula Rytila or Susan Sheehan. I do know Juha Putkiranta, he was around back way in the day, so he is long term Nokia and been in increasing positions over time, its about 'his time' now for this level of a senior position. But Chris Weber for global head of sales. This is a totally boneheaded move. This is taking the red flag and waving it at the raging bull. This is sheer madness. Chris came from Microsoft with Elop. Chris was named US sales boss. Microsoft had already had a difficult relationship with the carrier community worldwide before last year. Those relationships were severely made worse when Microsoft bought Skype last May. Then Microsoft (and Nokia) were attempting to bully the carriers with the Lumia launches and then threats with the Skype integration. Still now in May, Elop admits to the Nokia shareholders meeting that Microsoft is trying to bully itself onto the carrier platforms with Skype threatening that Skype will come in any case.
What is the result? Nokia's CEO Stephen Elop himself admitted to the Nokia shareholders meeting now last month that all Microsoft Windows Phone smartphones are experiencing reluctance by carriers to sell them. Some have refused to sell any Windows phones altogether. Not my words, Elop's. The carriers hate Skype. They hate Microsoft now, because Microsoft gives Skype deep pockets and 1 Billion PC desktops on Windows 8, to threaten the very survival of the carrier business. 60% of the revenues and 50% of the profits of the carrier community come from voice calls - whose single biggest threat globally is that very same Skype. Then 30% of revenues and 45% of profits to the carriers comes from SMS text messaging - which is ALSO threatened by Skype. International calls are the most lucrative part of voice calls - that is what Skype is focused on. And then videocalls? The future of '3G' services - even now this week we heard Apple finally gives the next iPhone 3G videocalling ability on its Facetime. And yes, videocalls? Hugely cannibalized by.. Skype. And yes, it was Elop who specifically explained to the Nokia shareholders, yes carriers fear the revenue loss posed by Skype.
Skype is poison to the carrier business. We may love Skype as consumers. The carriers hate it. They hated Skype before last year, when it was 'only' 900 million users globally as a little threatening rival. Now that Microsoft owns Skype, Skype is far far more dangerous to the very survival of the carriers. And when Microsoft adds 1 Billion desktops to Skype, it just makes things so much more threatening. This is the ultimate poison pill. A cyanide capsule. So yes, right after Microsoft bought Skype, the Windows based smartphones were put on a sales boycott globally, as reported in various newsmedia and Ballmer himself has admitted Windows Phone sales have been below expectation (and he demoted some Windows Phone senior management).
The past Microsoft Windows Phone execs have talked of how much the carrier relationships of Microsoft got worse in 2011 and even Elop said now in May of 2012, that yes, it is explicitly because Microsoft owns Skype (not because Lumia phones might have Skype - they don't, and some even can't use Skype like Lumia 610). And we've seen the Windows partnership deteriorate because of this. Dell, LG and Sony have quit making Windows Phone based smartphones - for example Dell specifically said its because the carriers don't want to sell Windows. And HTC said they are shifting away from Windows Phone to Android? Why, because carriers don't support Windows sales. Samsung? Didn't say why, but is shifting from Windows Phone to bada, Android and soon also Tizen.
And Elop again now yesterday said in the conference call to analysts that yes, Nokia has a retail problem, that Windows Phone sales have been disappointing. Bloomberg quotes Elop yesterday saying Nokia Lumia sales have been "slower than we would like." This is the same Nokia Lumia smartphone sales whose stategy was strong and Elop was so confident in just what, in April? The same Lumia that had been having such a strong launch, accoriding to Elop just weeks ago? Tech Crunch which listened in on the call reports it like this "Elop pointed out that Nokia was still having issues with retail salespeople." Those sales people were "reticent to recommend Lumia smartphones to potential buyers." (reticient means unwilling or silent) And Tech Crunch quotes Elop directly as saying: “The challenge in all of this is breaking through the strength Android and Apple have in a retail environment, we aren’t getting the traction we prefer.”
SELF-INFLICTED WOUND
Before the Elop Effect there was no 'strength' that Android or Apple had in retail. You walked into any telecoms retail store on the five continents where Nokia did well (not in North America obviously) and there were stacks of Nokias and the retail staff ran at you to sell you.. a Nokia! Nokia was famous for dominating the retail environment. Not just competitive, dominating it. This was regularly listed as one of Nokia's biggest strengths, when analysts wondered, how could Nokia, with clearly older technology smartphones on Symbian, outsell Apple by 2 to 1, and Samsung by 3 to 1 globally? Yes, that is true. As recently as 18 months ago, Nokia was outselling Apple iPhones - I mean yes, Nokia smartphones, Nokia Symbian based smartphones - were outselling all iPhones by 2 to 1. More than 2 to 1 in fact. And all Samsungs by 3 to 1. Where did this retail environment domination disappear in the past 18 months? The sales dudes and dudettes who had so loved Nokia did not suddenly all retire last year? All throughout China, India, Brazil, Russia, Germany, Mexico, Indonesia, Australia, Egypt, Nigeria, Spain, Italy, France, you name it. The global handset retail environment WAS Nokia. The others begged for tidbits in the retail space. The carrier top management had to give special bonuses to help LG or SonyEricsson or Samsung or HTC or RIM to sell, when the customers asked for Nokia and the sales was all too eager to give it to them.
This is what Elop owned in January of last year. The world's best reseller channel globally. The best carrier relationships (except in North America) and the bestselling dumbphones AND the bestselling smartphones on all five inhabited continents where on that continent you do not have six strong domestic handset rival manufacturers (like they do in the USA).
AGITATE THE WOUND TO MAKE IT HURT EVEN MORE
So the problem was caused by the Elop Effect. What did Elop do since? He could have tried to fix things. He didn't. He made things worse by feuding and taunting the carriers from yes, celebrating Skype, to taking Micrsoftian bullying tactics to Lumia launch orders - so much so that some European carriers were complaining outloud about this last Autumn (almost never happens that these come into the open). And now, Elop finds that his Nokia sales guy quits so what does he do? Did he take the most experienced, most trusted, longest-serving, fully superbly competent and accomplished Nokia senior salesdude to run his global Nokia sales? Someone who is known personally by the major carriers, who goes playing golf with them and takes them to the FIFA tournament and the Formula One races year after year, knows the wife and kids, etc? The grand old man type of person in Nokia sales. Someone whose trust is beyond dispute at Nokia sales?
No. Elop appoints his stooge, the Microsoft dude, Chris Weber as his top sales gun. What a moron (Elop, not Weber). Why on earth would you do this? If you Elop are so insecure you need your fellow Microsoft Muppets around you, then don't appoint this total novice never-sold-a-handset-in-his-life until last year guy as your top sales guy, to go sell to companies BIGGER THAN NOKIA like Vodafone, China Mobile, Telefonica, America Movil etc... He is the very personificiation of Microsoft. Everything the carriers hate.
And his normal tactics were of course learned at Microsoft to then bully, threaten, intimidate and lie to the carrier community. This has only made things worse. No. If you Elop have ruined carrier relationships, you don't send in your clone. Then you send in the 'anti Elop' the exact opposite, you know, Good Cop / Bad Cop. You send in the nice guy. The one who has been with Nokia sales so long his blood has turned from red to Nokia blue. That guy! You don't send in another Microsoft Muppet to anger the retail channel!!!
LETS LEARN FROM KALLASVUO
Ok.. Now what do we learn. Elop told of how he now plans to solve the riddle that is the carrier sales boycott against his phones. Elop has decided Nokia will offer us... cheaper phones! Ha. That means more damage to profits. As Nokia is already generating a loss - it means bigger losses. Didn't Elop just give us the third profit warning in 12 months? And his smartphone unit is now five straight quarters of making losses. Losses that are now increasing? And Elop's answer is .. yeah, I will get better sales by cutting prices. BTW the Lumia 610 - cheapest so far - is so weak, it can't do Angry Birds or Skype. What is your cheaper Lumia 510 not be able to do? Voice calls and messages? So we carry it in our pocket so we have what, a nice square pocket watch with alarm, perhaps?
LETS FOLLOW THE MOTOROLA STRATEGY
So did you like the movie called 'Fall of Motorola' but felt it was a bit too slow? You'd like to see the same movie remade but just to run faster? I've got that for you. This is what ZD Net reported of Elop's strategy now in sales. ZD Net writes without a hint of irony on the obvious contradiction in Elop's mission:
While the aim is to get more Lumia devices into the hands of consumers, Nokia will in fact narrow its direct sales and marketing efforts to select markets, palming off less significant ones to distributors to be managed through a central hub.
Wow. That is Elop's strategy. We will get more Lumias into the hands of our customers, by reducing sales and diminishing our presense. This is the very last desperate act of a global handset maker who is about to die. This is how Siemens... died. This is how Motorola... died. This is how Palm... died. You find you can no longer afford your global sales, you cut the sales force and then wonder a few months later, why did your sales fall even further...
Maybe I got it wrong? Surely Elop cannot be this much a moron? Or did I. Here is ZD Net reporting more with direct quote from Elop: “We’re deliberately going through a cycle of concentrating on some markets at the expense of others.”
So Nokia is going to increase sales by reducing sales. Aha. That sounds ..illogical. If you thought this company can be saved, and now among his 10,000 people Elop is firing willy-nilly all around the planet, is the last Nokia competitive advantage, its sales superiority - a sales force so strong, they were beating Apple while Nokia smarpthones ran Symbian for heaven's sake. And beating the iPhone like a rented mule, Nokia outsold the iPhone by 2 to 1 for gosh sake when Elop took over. No. This company is dead now. This is the last act of a despeate man.
WHAT ABOUT MAPPING
Ha, what was that? So Nokia's CEO - really, the CEO, says he will now use Nokia navigation and mapping to rescue the company? Isn't this the same Nokia that bought - and owns Navteq, a purchase of 8 Billion dollars five years ago that never turned a profit in Nokia's ownership? And now in this environment of falling handset sales, a change in operating systems, mass layoffs and retrenching from global sales, somehow Nokia can turn the perennial turkey, Location-based services (the worst-performing mobile service category of all time) suddenly into a 'winner' ? Wow, give me some of that crack cocaine you are smoking Mr Elop. So just as we hear Apple adding its mapping stuff to the iOS with TomTom, you can somehow now suddenly turn the loss-maker into a profit engine? Wow, cool? Happy that you were able to tell us this magic dust and how it works, Mr Delusional.
SO WHAT DID WE LEARN?
So we know that Elop can look at a problem for 14 months in a row, and come to the conclusion his strategy is fine and while retail sales is the problem, he can solve it by firing staff, closing factories, buying suppliers. Then that Elop doesn't like any critical or informed feedback, he wants yes-men (or women). He has no safety net left, all knowledgable top staff have fled, resigned in protest or been fired. Elop thinks his carrier relationship problem can be fixed by appointing the most unacceptable guy to run that. He fires his former confidant and colleague who did the right job in marketing - because of problems in retail sales she had nothing to do with. This means no mid-level or senior manager can trust the psycopath in charge, he is not behaving rationally and any rational subordinate obviously is planning to leave Nokia soon if they haven't already gotten out of there (most of the best minds left soon after Elop was exposed to them).
We see here is the Captain of the Titanic who sees his ship is headed towards an iceberg. He could attempt to correct course, to shift direction. But he refuses to deal with the big problem (retail sales boycott) he rather goes to rearrange the deck chairs like selling Vertu and buying, what was that Swedish company again, Scalado. He sells more handsets by reducing sales. He turns loss-making Navteq suddenly into a profit engine. Sure. Why don't you just solve the sales boycott, Mr Elop, which would only take two things - terminate the Windows Phone Lumia project - and fire yourself (and take that Weber dude with you).
MEANWHILE IN REAL WORLD
I said last year in early June, right after Microsoft had bought Skype that there would be a carrier revolt about that. The boycott appeared within days and was reported widely. Elop admitted to the Nokia Shareholders meeting last month that a year later, after Microsoft had met with the carriers - often with Nokia - they could not break the boycott. LG, Sony and Dell have ended their development of Windows Phone smartphones due to the carrier refusal to sell them. HTC and Samsung are shifting to their alternate platforms. Only Nokia CEO is pigheadedly steadfast in his madness. I don't care that the past year we have seen a sales boycott. This time we do the same thing, and we expect a different result!
So lets see what we see from the people who are not insane in the membrain. Lee Simpson at Jeffreys comments on Lumia sales now: "disapointment." Michael Genovese of MKM Partners says they have inspected stores and found "No one is buying Nokia's Windows Phones". (where is your Windows outselling iPhone widely reported BS story now, haha). Well, there is of course America. Or is there? CNet has done a study of Lumia US invasion, and dug round, and found: "Despite a mountain of hype and support behind it, Nokia's Lumia 900 was no blockbuster." They report that since the launch, "the momentum and buzz has faded."
Mr Elop gave the Lumia launch the biggest budget ever seen at Nokia. Elop said in October of last year that Lumia would get 3 times bigger launch marketing budget than ever seen in Nokia's history for any new phones. That is now gone. So then? By January Elop was back to blaming the sales channel. The Register reported that Elop said "Dumb salesmen are hurting us" in its headline. That was reality. Now lets examine the alternate reality inside Elop's head. How does a delusional CEO deal with those facts:
In February 2012, in an interview to South Africa's Business Day, Elop was saying that "Nokia’s future was secure." (SECURE? Company generating record losses and his sales have failed) And Business Day writes of Elop that "his optimism about Nokia’s future was based on a new strategy he unveiled in February last year." Perhaps worst of all, in the same interview Elop was asked about Samsung as a rival. Elop said he "would not lose sleep" over Samsung!! This was in February 2012. Nokia had been the world's largest handset maker for 14 years. In March 2012, only weeks after this article, Samsung would pass Nokia to become the world's biggest handset maker. Oh, and in those smartphones, when Elop took over 18 months ago, Nokia was 3 times bigger than Samsung. Today Samsung is 4 times bigger than Nokia in smartphones. Good thing you kept your eyes on the ball, Chester. Not losing sleep! Nice that you went shopping for Swedish imaging makers and Norwegian software makers and selling a factory in Romania, rather than focus on your biggest rival and help Nokia compete.
Yesterday the Nokia share price fell 18% in one day, the biggest fall it has ever had. The share price had climbed 11% in the first 5 months when Elop was in charge, when he executed the previous strategy. After his magnificent new strategy unveilled in February 2011, Nokia share price has fallen by 74%. Today we heard that Moody's has joined the two other ratings agencies downgrading Nokia to junk. All three ratings agencies rated Nokia one notch below perfect when Elop took charge. I think we can see the pattern here. The Captain sees the iceberg. He knows he could save his ship. But he would rather go fire 10,000 engineers and buy a Swedish company. He's rather rearrange the deck chairs. Full Steam Ahead!
This is mentioned in Finnish IT news today (scroll down to see the video):
http://www.digitoday.fi/vimpaimet/2012/06/25/outo-video-esittelee-nokia-air--palvelun-puhelimia-ja-tabletin/201232111/66
The video is spreading in YouTube, apparently showing Nokia Air-cloud service, phones and a tablet. The source CANNOT BE CONFIRMED at the moment. Possibly some developer had enough of it on the extended weekend?
Oh, and I have heard about Nokia MeeGo-tablet here. There is no official confirmation about it. Mind you, I live in Oulu.
Posted by: MikaA | June 25, 2012 at 10:30 AM
@MikaA: if it is Meltemi/MeeGo - it is most probably gone... :-(
Maybe it is S40 based? Like the new Ashas? What a hit it would be... :-)
Posted by: zlutor | June 25, 2012 at 10:41 AM
@MikaA
The video shows a 3D rendered concept operating system in order to show a concept. It looks like Symbian but it isn't. This video was probably created before the Microsoft brainwash and that's why they use Symbian/Meego like icons.
Posted by: AtTheBottomOfTheHilton | June 25, 2012 at 11:05 AM
According to my understanding, the operating system demoed in the video is Meltemi and the most probable motivation of this is to show what was brewing up in Nokia. Investors would indeed be well advised to question the wisdom of the BOD.
Posted by: MikaA | June 25, 2012 at 12:17 PM
Nokia is nosediving very steeply today.... Hold your hats in Oulu, BWAHAHAH!
Mika, say hello to PERTTU from me!
Posted by: TomoTomo | June 25, 2012 at 12:43 PM
@MikaA
or maybe some Meego/Meltemi team who just got sacked by Elop Management trying to send a message?
btw, the UI/UX looks very cool.... better than WP7/Wp8 BullCrap
Posted by: cycnus | June 25, 2012 at 02:53 PM
Can't believe my eyes... Look at the F***ING nokia stock now.... Its plummeting like a stone! OOH RAHH!! It is the DAY OF JUDGEMENT !!
I believe it will go under $2 today !!
Posted by: Yuri | June 25, 2012 at 05:26 PM
@K.Aho (swedish language blogger who made previous comment addressed to me)
thanks for posting the links KotiAho ; www.aho.hk and your old linux site are really good.
Posted by: LocalGuy | June 26, 2012 at 03:43 AM
Hi all
First, please note, I have now written an update based on the Windows 8 non-upgrade announcement, and a blog with the revised market share estimate (Down to 2% for end of 2012)
Tomi Ahonen :-)
Posted by: Tomi T Ahonen | June 27, 2012 at 11:09 PM
Now continuing on some replies (we are on early comments from June 15)
Hi N9, Platform, Malcolm, The, Ryan and Titanium
N9 - haha funny
Platform - totally agree with you. Stupid management. If the CEO and Board wanted to shift to Windows, the sensible way to do it, as Nokia had Symbian as its cash cow, would have been a gradual transition, and start that with the US market where Nokia was traditionally weakest and Microsoft strongest, where upside potential greatest and Nokia damage to existing platform least. Then with MeeGo ready to run and Meltemi coming, only a madman would refuse to sell MeeGo handsets - when other smartphone sales collapsing - or refuse to finish Meltemi - two months before launch - when both Microsoft and Nokia have said repeatedly Windows Phone is not suited for low-cost smartphones (where Nokia's main market is).
Malcolm - very good points about HTC. That is truly an unloved child, isn't it. And the Lumia experience is exactly as I predicted when Elop first revealed that his Windows Phone smartphones were being designed in the USA - they may be suited for the US consumers (maybe) but they are NOT suited for the 95% where the rest of the phones are sold, where Nokia held over 50% market share in smartphones haha..
The - I hope so. But where is it?
Ryan - yes, since you posted that, we have it confirmed and I blogged about it.
Titanium - yeah, this will go down in history as one of the great case studies of how one manager destroyed a giant company in record time
Thank you all for the comments
Tomi Ahonen :-)
Posted by: Tomi T Ahonen | June 27, 2012 at 11:18 PM
@Earendil Star:
"It is now certain that WP8 will not support current Lumias."
Who cares? It will be pretty damn hard to replace hardware via software upgrade which is the main reason to upgrade to WP8 anyway. If geeks are not included, how many of normal consumers will upgrade OS? I'm pretty happy with Lumia 800, and I have no reason to update to WP8, not even LTE. LTE is a must for Windows 8 tablets though, since surfing the web, playing games and streaming videos is the main usage for it anyway for consumers. For business users, it'll be a dream come true, no more need for toys like iPad.
"Practically, they shoved this BS OS to Nokia and consumers"
Even now, WP7.5 with Nokia extensions is way better than Android, thats why Lumia 900 is the 2nd best seller on AT&T (on April and May) right after iPhone 4S, even with the lower tech specs, and despite the competition from high profile Android handsets, such as HTC One X. That's why 1/3 of the phones sold in Finland by the biggest carrier were using Windows Phone platform. The co-founder of Apple Steve Wozniak said "Android has no chance against Lumia" (when speaking UI Design and usability) and it is partly better than iOs. It's useless to take Symbian or Meego into this discussion, they would have no chance against these 3.
@elm70:
"iPhone is and was not the start of the Nokia problems"
iPhone was the mother of all problems. After iPhone, people immediately noticed, what is the minimum standard for a smartphone. Thats why Symbian sales had dropped 60% even before arrival of Elop. Android just started imitating iOs (did it poorly but cheaply), as did everyone else. Except Windows Phone.
@John Titor
"I have thirty years experience in software and say that Nokia will die. What you say about that. Windows Phone does not die but Nokia, Nokia will die, oh yes it will, oh yes you will see that day! I promise you! So dont get arrogant, mister!"
That's what people said pretty much about Apple in the mid 80's.
@Euforiusz:
"Symbian phones, were fast, stable with plenty 3rd party software on them"
Symbian phones were fast, because they were ugly. I really don't think they were as fast as Lumia 900 though. Symbian phones were not stable, I had to boot my last 2 Nokia phones (E75, N8) at least once a week. N8 was the most useless "smartphone" in the existence of human history and was one of the biggest reasons for Nokia's downhill. If that was Nokia's "flagship", they were completely lost their minds. After using Lumia 800 for 4 months, I have had no need to boot it at all. I actually liked E75 with QWERTY, and rumors tell that Sprint will have WP8 QWERTY keyboard from Nokia in Q3/Q4. I wish that will arrive in Finland as well. Ovi Store had 116 000 apps on December 2011, which is about the same as WP Marketplace currently has.
Posted by: Timo Pitkäranta | July 03, 2012 at 11:46 AM
> Even now, WP7.5 with Nokia extensions is way better than Android, thats why Lumia 900 is the 2nd best seller on AT&T <
HAHAHA
Best seller .. yes ... with : http://gs.statcounter.com/#mobile_os-US-monthly-201106-201207 saying the opposite
WP7.5 way better then Android ... Yes, this only few corrupted Nokia Board members can say this without break down in smiles ...
Tchuss
e_lm_70
ps: Did Elop promise you a new job? soon his mission to destroy Nokia is completed ... get ready for the next destruction mission .. of for a deserved jail.
NOKIA RIP
Posted by: elm70 | July 03, 2012 at 01:16 PM
@elm
June 30:
http://www.technobloom.com/nokia-lumia-900-is-still-the-second-best-selling-device-at-att/2210230/
Posted by: CN | July 03, 2012 at 01:25 PM
@cn
http://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2012/05/23/microsoft-passes-apple-in-china-as-nokia-cheers/
---------------------------
Microsoft declared that it has made good on what seemed like a lofty claim made just two months back that it plans to overtake iPhone’s market share in China. According to the company’s COO for the Greater China region, Microsoft’s Windows Phone has already reached 7% smartphone market share in the country trumping Apple iPhone’s 6%.
---------------------------
Do you believe on this ?
Statistics ... made by machine tell a different story:
http://gs.statcounter.com/#mobile_os-CN-monthly-201106-201207
Tchuss
e_lm_70
ps: Also in china WP from a peak at 0.56%, now is declining : 0.49%, that means the new sales of WP are less then 0.5% of the total new sales ... can you say: TOTAL FAILURE ?
Posted by: elm70 | July 03, 2012 at 04:04 PM
Anyhow .. you can also have a different reading, if you believe in the "http://www.technobloom.com/nokia-lumia-900-is-still-the-second-best-selling-device-at-att/2210230/ " ... I don't ... but let assume it is true.
The internet traffic show a decline of presence of WPhone in the network coming from US ... this does not means that there are less people using Windows Phone (so less people buying Windows Phone) ... but just that people that have Windows Phone don't use it for browse internet.
This will be something even more shocking ... people that are buying Windows Phone are people used to have a dumb-phone .. that are happy with just type SMS and make voice call ... so, a S40 user profile ... WOW ...
This will confirm that Lumia can be sold only for the good looking shape, and to basic smartphone user (or better to the dumbphone users) ... heavy users clearly prefer something else.
Interesting, iPhone in US is still growing, now it hold over 50% internet traffic ...
In china Android is sky climbing ... on the net the Android from china did double in 6 months :-o
Tchuss
e_lm_70
ps: Windows Phone 7.5 is DEAD ... hehe and 7.8 is a Joke ;-)
Nokia RIP
Posted by: elm70 | July 03, 2012 at 04:14 PM
@elm70
--or--
as I said it when nokia firstly introduce the nokia lumia 800.
WP7 can't fight Android and iOS
BUT!!!!
WP7 is a GREAT OS to replace S40.
Microsoft/Nokia should think to sell the Lumia 800 in US$ 70-150 price range non-contract.
Posted by: cycnus | July 03, 2012 at 04:29 PM
@ Timo Pitkäranta and cn.
Can we finally stop this BS please? Sorry for being so direct.
If what you are saying were true (that WP7 was so good), MS would not have had any reason to develop WP8 in the first place.
They could have safely done an incremental update of WP7, with no upgrade issues for Lumias whatsoever.
In fact, WP7 is inherently obsolete. It's not a hardware problem. It is the SW itself that is based on an obsolete kernel (CE) & technology.
The only new thing about WP7 is the Metro interface. Eye candy. Everything else is recycled, as there was no time to improve the rest, given how late MS was and the need to come quickly to market.
The problem is that with the current fast pace of innovation in HW (thanks to ARM), WP7 phones would have been thrashed by Android at an ever increasing speed.
In other words, Android has been able for quite some time to fully exploit current HW offerings, and the superiority in performance compared to WP7 phones would have become huge (much more apparent than now) in very little time.
Remember: just a couple of months ago THT Elop was saying that quad core smartphones were useless, only good to warm your pockets. Now WP8 is out and... guess what? It is touted as so advanced that it is now able to... handle multiple core processors! Oh my! They are acknowledging Android was much further ahead... that they are finally catching up! Practically: that they had lied all along.
But even more importantly, if you buy a Lumia now, you will only get the 7.8 upgrade (eye candy, as usual), but no compatibility with the new WP8 apps.
This means the few apps available for WP7 will stop at their current level, and you will miss the new ones coming on WP8.
We are not talking about hardware here. We are talking about new apps being incompatible on WP7. Capisc?
By the way, we are also talking about an OS shipped on the Nokia Lumia 900, a (supposedly flagship) phone that was launched a measley two months ago.
The Lumia 900 is now totally obsolete and Osborned. Just unbelievable, if you think about the huge campaign that accompanied this phone's launch... around Easter!
I will not even comment on allegations that WP7 is better than Symbian, Meego or let alone iOS or Android.
If you are convinced that an OS that, for example, resets apps when you switch between them is ok, then, lol, keep it and be happy.
There must be a reason why very few (luckily) are buying it. Don't you agree?
In the end, however, the most disturbing thing is that MS & THT Elop knew this all along. Rumors that WP7 devices would not be upgradeable are as old as the first WP8 announcements.
So, MS and (THT Elop's) Nokia have lied to and let down their own customers.
They promised a flagship, they actually provided an obsolete brick with the only intent of keeping momentum for the WP platform while waiting for WP8 (or, if that's not gonna work, WP9).
As usual MS customers have been used for beta testing SW. I'm not sure they will like it.
Yet, I'm sure this was a calculated move by MS. When WP8 is out, they will have a more competitive platform, and will "only" have upset the few customers who trusted themselves and Nokia.
Hopefully (for MS), they will suffer minimal damage in exchange for a more reasonable chance to compete with iOS and Android in the future.
But this might backfire in mobile, where MS has no monopolistic advantage compared to the PC world.
So, just to summarise:
1) WP7 was an obsolete platform since inception, way behind the competition. This is proven by the need by MS to switch to WP8.
2) MS & Nokia have abused their mobile customer base, adding insult (trying to cover the facts of WP7 reality) to injury (WP7 being obsolete since inception)
Incidentally, there was a casualty in this entire process: Nokia. Small price to pay by MS, since they did not spend a single cent on what is now one of their captive OEMs and technology providers (mobile SW & HW know-how, Nokia Maps, patents, carrier relations, you name it). A totally free lunch. All they did was to just to pay for (WP) marketing campaigns.
Posted by: Earendil Star | July 03, 2012 at 05:29 PM
@elm
China: Yes, I do believe what was reported, taking into account two important fact behind the calim:
1. a certain 4 week period
2. unofficial iPhone shipment excluded
And hello, it's marketing, you know. ;-)
If I was as childish as you, I could ask you, do you believe Statscounter presents the absolute truth. You say yes, I say I don't. C'mon, you talk about hundredths of percentages and make hell of a noise about it. And draw conclusions on it. Why don't you do as so many of us - wait for the official numbers.
@earendil Star
You know, you're bullshit is exactly as big as my bullshit. ;-) Sorry for being so direct.
I simply don't get it with what's bothering you guys. Maybe everything you say, Earendil, is true. Not that I agree, you are also known to publish questionable/false claims here.
Why can't you behave like an adult? I believe Nokia and WP will make it, you don't. No need to jump on me on that.
Elm says Nokia is going to die. May I have your opinion on that? Are you as brave and would like to present your "fact" on this? Before you respond, I repeat that I know nothing, I only hope and believe in something. You?
Posted by: CN | July 03, 2012 at 08:21 PM
Hello Nokia muppets, and good afternoon! How much you think 1 cent Lumia 900 will bring into Nokia's pockets? What kind of bullshit market is that, in which Nokia's so called flagship model costs one cent ??
I don't know, but to me it sounds like total bullshit. It smells like total bullshit too. Guess it must be bullshit then.
Nokia is dead, they went all in but bet the wrong horse. A horse with a deadly illness. That horse was Windows Phone.
Posted by: Perttu Pitkäjorma | July 03, 2012 at 09:37 PM
@cycnus
Thanks for your post, it made me smile :-)
I agree with you that WP7 is in the same level of S40
Yes, it could be perfect for cheap phone, for me sub 100$ without contract
But let face WP7 is limited to qualcom cpu and 800x480 screen, that means it cant fit in a sub 100$ phone
So, WP7 is totally useless a total FAILURE
Tchuss
E_lm_70
Posted by: elm70 | July 03, 2012 at 09:40 PM