My Photo

Ordering Information

Tomi on Twitter is @tomiahonen

  • Follow Tomi on Twitter as @tomiahonen
    Follow Tomi's Twitterfloods on all matters mobile, tech and media. Tomi has over 8,000 followers and was rated by Forbes as the most influential writer on mobile related topics

Book Tomi T Ahonen to Speak at Your Event

  • Contact Tomi T Ahonen for Speaking and Consulting Events
    Please write email to tomi (at) tomiahonen (dot) com and indicate "Speaking Event" or "Consulting Work" or "Expert Witness" or whatever type of work you would like to offer. Tomi works regularly on all continents

Tomi on Video including his TED Talk

  • Tomi on Video including his TED Talk
    See Tomi on video from several recent keynote presentations and interviews, including his TED Talk in Hong Kong about Augmented Reality as the 8th Mass Media


Blog powered by Typepad

« Apple 20.3M iPhones in Q2. WOW. Throws gauntlet to Nokia and Samsung: stakes claim at biggest smartphone maker status | Main | Mid-year Update to Nokia Smartphone Forecast to 2011, with View to 2012 and new Microsoft based phones »

July 21, 2011



Tomi, I respect all of your writting and agree that Nokias situation would not have needed to come to this as fast as it did. Anyway, looking forward you should realize that Windows Phone has some major advantages over Qt on Symbian and Meego strategy:

1. It is a single non-fragmented OS, meaning that every single app will work on every single device: No redesigning the UI, no recomplining and no resubmitting your app. All the 25k apps in the Marketplace will actually be available to each and every device if the developer just checks an checkbox to make it available in that country. I doubt many Symbian devices (if any) have 25k apps available, even if the Ovi Store has over 50k apps in it.
2. Microsoft is undeniably the greatest software company on the planet and is extremely committed to develop and push Windows Phone. Infact, I've never seen them push anything this much or make such swift progress on anything, ever. Comparing the speed of development and ability to react on issues based on customer/developer feedback is from a different planet than what we've seen with Symbian and Meego.
3. There are many many times more .NET developers than Qt developers that could possible jump into backing the born mobile ecosystem. Additionally Microsoft's development tools and resources are unmatched.
4. The ecosystem Microsoft is building is not only a mobile ecosystem, but a whole "three screens and a cloud" one which can become a major selling point. Meego and Qt just couldn't match what Microsoft is building.
5. Microsoft has a bunch of services to put on the table that Nokia doesn't have. Most notably on the field of gaming, search, advertising and bussiness.

While Symbian might be well optimized for lower end hardware, technicly Windows Phone should be atleast as efficient as Android, and there are already Android phones out with 600MHz processors. MS did great job optimizing Mango and dropping the CPU requirement to 800MHz already. I don't think "Nokia doesn't have to pay for Symbian/Meego" is not a valid argument either. Paying for the development of two OSes sure isn't cheaper than paying for the WP license. Additonaly the MS deal did open Nokia some new income streams and marketing help.

Additionally when evaluating Nokias future, you should take into consideration all the technical (fragmentation) and legal difficulties Android is facing.

Alex Kerr

Good comment on AllAboutSymbian:


a.) Just think for a moment where we'd be if Elop had said nothing about Symbian's end of life, back in the Feb 11th announcement. If he'd only said things that supported the platform (e.g. selling well, sales up, Anna + Belle coming, new GHz devices coming) etc. This was perfectly possible whether or not he'd said they're going to try WP phones too. And for anyone using the excuse that "he had to announce a massive total change to satisfy investors" - oh yeah? Look at the share price and market cap etc. So you're saying that would have been much lower if he hadn't announced Symbian's death?

b.) Just think for a moment where we'd be if Elop had decided to stick it out with Symbian and MeeGo, not give up on them, and make them work. Perfectly possible. So, i.e. the same as what we have now (i.e. announced improvements to Symbian) plus all the S40 stuff, just no WP at all.

I think in both cases Nokia would be MASSIVELY, MASSIVELY better off than they are now.

And hey, a 3rd option of c.) Taking b.) as above, but also developing WP phones in secret with MS and not announcing them until they were ready and then releasing them in select markets. That answers all critics and problems - solves all the Feb 11th fallout and secures Nokia's future with WP *at just the same timeframe as we have now* should Symbian actually not be fit for purpose as some people say (I believe it would be fine for years if they did some UI improvements).



JM, you are making wrong counts on .net developers, while MS may have more .net developers, they are working for desktop/enterprise realm, there is no need to develop for windows phone to make a living. real developers for wp7.5 is much much less. plus not all .net developer can do silverlight, very smaller batch can do silverlight. furthuer more, MS is going to dump siverlight in prefering html5. haha, meego already have it in support.

as to the hardware optimiaztion, it is more about graphics accleration. guess what, even my latest laptop intel i5 can not run silverlight application smoothly b/c it is coupled with intel built-in graphics accelerator which is not enough.

imagine how much power it will need to run silverlight on smart phone. it wnot last for one day for sure which is main problem android faces due to its java wrapper.

meego does it much better than android and wm7.5.

fire elop, increase n9 production and sell n9 to the every region where human beings live,please.


Alex Kerr, you got it right, however, this elop comes to nokia on his own agenda which is against the interests of investors, consumers, distributors, employees. he is also not for the interests of MS but for himself. b/c he is a criminal for criminals on Wall Street.


How big crime has Steve Elop committed to nokia investors, $20B.

Christian Maurice

Good point Leebase, Apple is the only good computer maker. Apple is in good shape and will continue to be in good shape. Nokia need scale and big marketshare like Samsung. Nokia is in very bad shape... The true Nokia competitor is Samsung and LG...



All this is very sad. But honestly, important and transcedental decisions like Elop has taken, cannot be taken without the Board's approval. So for me "Gold Standard" Olilla and his Board are to blame:

a) For allowing OPK and his bureaucracy to screw up Nokia
b) For hiring a guy without previous telecoms experience like Elop
c) For allowing Elop to go ahead with his crazy plans and supporting his anouncements from February and onwards
d) For not having fired him until now. Even after these catastrophic results and his crazy statements about Meego and N9, which are actually quite criminal. Am sure this guy is getting a HUGE payoff from MSFT for all his deeds...

Olilla needs to be fired first. And then Elop...

Thanks for your blog


Cheers Tomi!

You were right since the beginning:

1 - THERE IS a boycott from carriers.
2 - It affects the whole Nokia portfolio of smart and dumbphones
3 - MeeGo Qt strategy was the best way since the beginning since now we see what it was capable with N9 and N950 (what we didn't knew on February but Tomi has always stated)
4 - Elop is a Trojan since he insists to focus on the unready WP during a catastrophic moment while there is a ready-to-go iPhone Killer inside his pocket. That benefits only Microsoft. That is absurd.
5 - Investors are CLEARLY showing what they want and that they new what would happen from this partnership: On 11th February Nokia stocks felt 10% on few hours. Now that the 11th February strategy showed its results stocks raised almost 7% already. Wall street knew it. why so many people still so damn blind?

The same stockholders that pressured Nokia for profits on September 2010 now shall ask them to go back to the old strategy and sell the N9 and N950 worldwide on a quarter that probably Apple nor Android wont be able to answer. Apple is too busy with the SIM card design, and with Steve Job's succession. Google is more focused on their social media strategy. All the others elements are just waiting to go. Ovi store, Qt development tools (that include S40 now), developers, carriers (like china mobile), even Intel partnership could be reestablished.

Another important thing was the opinion of Eldar Murtazin. He said what nobody (except for me) has said before: Nokia has an incredibly bad corporative climate now. There is absolutely NO TRUST on the leadership. Leaks and internal sabotage are happening all the time: new phones where leaked (the symbian 1ghz phones) and even software updates where leaked (symbian anna)

Now I guess that even for a blind deadman is very clear to see which is the wrong way and which is the right way. Is only a matter of time, I hope so.

If not, then we can say näkemiin Nokia (goodbye Nokia on finnish) hahaha

Earendil Star

Were it not for the plight of Nokia's employees, developers, stockholders and you name it, this situation would just be ridiculous. Yes: the situation is grave, but not serious.

One comment to all those defending TH Elop, the MS Dark Lord, and saying that everything was doomed from well before.
Did you see the latest numbers and graphs on smartphone sales? For example on AllAboutSymbian?
You must have noticed that the plunge -for Nokia- starts in Q1 2011, not earlier. This is FACT.
Who made the infamous February speech in Q1? You know better than I.
When did the first loss in decades take place? Shortly afterwards, in Q2 2011.
No need to add anything more. Everything to the contrary is just wishful commenting and not based on facts.
TH Elop's ways cannot be explained unless you consider him an (incomptetent) MS employee.
A CEO should be judged by the consequences of his actions. In this case, the consequences are catastrophic.
The simple fact that he is still holding his post is mind boggling... unless he was called in to actually destroy the company.

Sorry for the useless rant, but it's sad to see a company like Nokia being annihilated the way it is.
Not from a fair fight against noble challengers, but consumed from within by vicious injected parasite.


@LeeBase I think that Apple is in very good shape in the computer market because of the iPod and iPhone. They were almost bankrupt.

Also I do not care if Apple, Samsung or Nokia is making more money. I care of the money that I, as a developer, can do. This is why the market share is important to me. Of course it's important to know of this market share how many are potential clients and this may not be equal to market share. For example, some time ago we sold an application to a customer that buyed symbian phones. He wanted the functionality and he didn't care about the sexiness of the device. Now I see that this niche is being taken by Android. iPhone is not an option here and I believe that Windows Phone won't be as they do not allow to sell privatelly.

Tomi T Ahonen

Hi all - first, I will be responding to all of you by name. Please keep the comments coming.

Secondly, please note, I have added now the revised projection of Nokia Q3 and Q4 market share, unit sales, ASP and revenues (and profits).

Hi Murat, rodrigottr, Baudrillard, Sami, Boris, peter and Sad

Murat - on iPhone peak. I was RIGHT that iPhone peaked, but it was for that quarter - nobody else called that - and I was OFF by exactly one percentage point of market share, that iPhone didn't peak for the year. As a forecaster, if I can be within one percentage point, I'll take that error any day. If you want to gloat about it, go gloat with all the other forecasters who were off by 5%, 10% even 20% for the year.

rodrigottr - thanks! :-)

Baudrillard - yeah. When will they wake up? I have some thoughs of how to wake them up haha.. stay tuned.

Sami - on 'firing Elop won't save anything' - you say declining market share is now locked in. Please consider this: First, that the resellers are in Nokia boycott - even Elop admits it (carriers are reducing inventory, haha, euphemism). The CUSTOMERS would be HAPPY to buy N8, E7, X7 etc phones if the resellers were not switching the buyers to Android and iPhone devices. Remember Q4 results, it was premium phones that were up, jumping ASP by a Nokia-record 15% in one quarter and boosting smartphone profits by 65%. The devices are good, the OS is good, the customers want the phones. Of course by now the N8 is not the hot phone of last Christmas but there is a slew of newer Symbian phones already out too. If the reseller boycott could be lifted, Nokia Symbian sales would instantly rebound - to some degree. Never back to 29% they were before Feb 11, but far above the dismal 15% where Nokia is today. Even if Nokia Symbian sales 'only' grew to half-point, ie to 22%, and at only today's 142 Euro ASP, that would mean added revenues of 1 Billion Euros - and at the Q4 profitability rate which we now know thanks to Nokia's new accounting - at 'only' 12.5% - that would give the smartphone unit 132 million Euros of profits. If that happened now in Q2, Nokia's smartphone unit would be only 10 million in the red, not 142 million Euros.

So the key is to end the boycott. That means killing Microsoft WP7. If Elop were to say 'hey, I was kidding, we won't do MS' - nobody will believe him. The only way Nokia will be believed that MS is dead, is if Elop is first fired. Even then, its not enough. Then Nokia has to have a CREDIBILE story why Symbian is resurrected. And that is MeeGo and Qt (and Ovi). So fire Elop, new CEO (or interim CEO/Chairman Ollila) announces return of MeeGo+Symbian strategy, that and I believe only that, would restore the reseller channel's belief that Nokia will not pull a bait-and-switch on them in a few months and launch MS after all.

What do you think, Sami. If Nokia did that, and key to it is firing Elop - Nokia could recover some of the lost Symbian sales - because the handsets and OS and Ovi are fine, the customers want them, but its the resellers who are now strangling Nokia.

As to blaming Elop. You are totally right that there were severe problems with Nokia years before Elop came along. You and I have debated here many times those issues, and you remember well my long blog about how I would fix Nokia - all about the marketing and execution, not the OS haha.. And I recall you also agreed with some of my suggested moves back from the blog in January, long before Burning Platforms. But Elop did now cause the terminal catastrophy. Nokia was mildly on the mend by Q4 with Elop newly in charge. Not fixed and solved by any means, but on the mend. And there were tons of things that needed to be done. Changing the OS was not the way to do it. That would only add to unnecessary complexity and change and disruption, without any perceivable benefits over Nokia's existing strategy of Symbian+MeeGo. you'll also remember I argued here a bit before the Microsoft announcement, that Nokia had the best smartphone strategy and would be crazy to abandon it haha.. (and it was)

So I have to blame Elop. He found Nokia near the edge of the canyon. And he pushed Nokia over the edge. All the trouble now is because of Elop and starts form Burning and Feb 11 Microsoft, and has been made worse since.

Boris - thanks, very funny.

peter - I agree, but if someone from the Board says now in public that Elop has to go, I think that Board member would get to stay :-)

Sad - some very interesting observations there (Guantanamo etc) and I appreciate your background. But on Microsoft having 40% with Nokia and partners in two years - that was a plausible (but unlikely) scenario back in February. It is now utterly impossible for a vast range of reasons. I will be blogging here a specific story to explain, so don't worry now, just please come back in a few days and read that blog, and lets discuss there, ok? Just wait, I have to do several blogs now so it will take me a bit of time. But I will explain why 20% by Microsoft - half what you believe - is impossible even by end of 2013. Not unlikely. Impossible. But don't worry, I will explain in full. Coming shortly.

Thank you all for commenting. I will return with more comments soon. Keep the discussion going.

Tomi Ahonen :-)


You know what when someones platelets count in blood decreases because of some disease he gets weakened.He gets more weakened before he could actually realize the weakness. So when he finally realizes there's something wrong he rushes to hospital. Now hospital starts treatment. Still his platelet count goes down day by day.But when treatment starts the rate at which this count goes down becomes lower still damage continues until comes the day when you see very small decrement. And then slowly everything starts to become normal.
Apply this to Nokia.They were screwed up very badly. Even before Apple talked about iPhone/iOS, these Fins were working on touch UI. Maemo was there but it was not widespread nor it was widespread. Much hyped S60 Touch UI turned out be disappointment.Yes Nokia was still holding its ground but that was purely because of non-touch S60.With N97, S60 5th Ed.was screwed up further. A commenter here,'Sad day for europe' said in this comment "used to work for them but when I suggested that the Nokia N900 should have GSM capabilities, Ansi Vanjoki called me an idiot, his words were: No one would buy a big touch screen phone...". Yes even before Elop became CEO Nokia never put too much efforts behind Maemo.It had USB OTG from long ago and nobody knew it,atleast me. Nokia's attitude was don't fix it unless it's broken.They are the victim of they invented. Smarthone market was never fierce until Nokia release N95 which redefined smartphones. Their real fall-down started with N96.Then N97.Two consecutive N-series flagships were not received that well.In fact 5800 was much better in terms of software and sales than N97. They had screwed up Symbian development badly. It wasn't the Nokia signed program that did it. Developing for Symbian had become painful task ever with complex Symbian SDKs. You should try development. Even the Symbian OS itself was screwed because of different teams working on different parts of the OS and no coordination between them. Elop said it right, at Nokia software was considered as just another component of phone. That's the reason it took it so long to Symbian appear in its latest S^3 form. Cutting off ropes for Symbian from companys need of time. You know what Nokia was the biggest spender on R&D in whole Europe. It spent even more than Ford without any innovation at all. Most of their expenses were because of Symbian.Discontinuing Symbian has saved them many dollars. Though they will have to pay royalty to MS for every phone they make it'd be significantly lower than what it would cost them for every Symbian phone. I can say that because Nokia won't have to work on development tools n all and the WP7 is using the same programming languages which are used to develop desktop MS apps. So app development will be the MS' part to worry. By switching to WP7 Nokia is saving money on whole R&D thing. When Nokia was using Symbian it would customize their OS differently for every phone. They never kept it uniform. Not even for single series like N-series. N97 and 5800 had totally differently customized OS.5800 didn't have widgets support then. This thing was one more reason to complex and slow Symbian development and FW upgrades. Beside you couldn't upgrade your OS from current level to next one something which all OS could or can do including WinMo. Repeated Alarm was first introduced on N95 which was running on S60 3rd Ed.FP1 a feature which was there on Nokia featurephones from long ago. Why it took so long? Beside that feature and many others were not given to phones running on S60 3rd Ed.initial release like N73.Was it that hard? Yes. They would have to make whole OS compatible and optimized for older devices again.Resource wasting business.
Yes WP7 wasn't doing that well.But it's growing with baby steps.It's uniform across all phones.So wat's Nokia getting in this deal. They are getting special permissions to interfere with WP7 software which no other manufacturer has got.That's why you don't get HTC Sense UI on WP7.Besides the customized WP7 will run on phones other companies too.Nokia's excellent map services will on run many other phones.They can earn money there. Besides MS guidelines ensure that UX on all WP7 phones will be smooth and won't take 'another' learning curve when switching to another company.Phones will be upgradeable to newer WP7 versions too just because of required hardware which is already there. Android in this case is pretty bad. Companies use Android 2.2,some will even dare to use 2.1 to make phones using some pretty cheap hardware and then they will simply refuse updates. Look at how thoroughly MS verifies its WP7 and then only they release it to customers which also makes it(WP7) very stable.
Yes Qt is not supported by WP7 right now. But WP7 isn't ultimate. It's just 'meantime' release. Actual things will start when Windows 8 will arrive.It's said to have Qt support. With Win8 there will be support for ARM and SoCs so I won't be surprised if WP7 will be merged in or replaced by Win8.
MeeGo as everyone says is the only savior for Nokia isn't quite true.Nokia doesn't develop whole MeeGo just the handset part of it, though they were biggest contributor of MeeGo project. Besides that core MeeGo isn't ready to step in the market. What you see on N9 is the Harmattan UI which does magic. It's absolutely right that Elop announced his WP7 plans for company much sooner than needed. He should have held it until end of Q2 then another two quarters wouldn't have made much difference.
Right now what I see is damage is being done by the previous wrong decisions taken by previous CEOs. Yes they are bleeding but they are not yet dead. There are peak points and bottom points.Everything that goes up has to come down and then again has to go up.Nokia had seen peak points and in this rapidly changing industry nobody stays at top for very long. Nokia wasn't at peak, what we saw is when Nokia was going towards peak so it was all good.Now we've to see when they are going down. Last few statements look much irrelevant but that just came.



Everyone says Feb.11 was bad day ever for Nokia but it was right time and right words to bring Nokia out of it's own dreamland where everything looked pretty.

joel jaeggli


regarding which quarter in which the smartphone implosion began.

basically everything some of the fellows observed was likely in 2007 has come to pass... It's incredibly difficult to pick the quarter in which the decline began but as far back as the beginning of the global recession the nokia smart phone business was not expanding as fast as the the industry as a whole. like and avalanche the initial slide looks minor but slide accelerates and gathers mass as it moves down hill. the pretense of not abandoning the platform might have changed to the timing slightly but the terminal velocity was ultimately going to be the same.

maemo and meego got balled up in symbian fail so long ago it's not funny, the business landscape is littered with to little to late.

Troll Tech

Hey, Elop is not an idiot. He is a Microsoft's agent. His goal is to kill a competitor, that's it!


You think OPK or Ollila or even Tomi would handle this situation better than Elop? If yes then you are still dreaming...

I don't understand why Tomi hates Elop soooo much, ok, he's not a finn but at least he can speak English very well haha. Tomi, you better enjoy your self, take a couple of biers at Wan Chai nightclubs and relax a bit and let Elop do his job, will you?

Nokia would stay on Symbian (boring OS, new Anna? Great, but did you see behind the code? If not then better not to say anything) and Meego Harmattan (two devices in one year?) until when? Until Apple produces a cheaper variant of iPhone and takes over the whole emerging market too? This will come soon or later and when it comes, Nokia will be even more in deep...

Nokia was "falling down" already since their upper management decided not to concentrate/prioritize higher touch UI long time ago. And now, iPhone and iOS is their UI/UX "norm" and reference for Nokia UI/UX designers, what a shame actually.


@tomi, thanks for the points. I'm just never going to agree with you that the Symbian OS "is good". It's not. Not from a developer's perspective, not from a usability perspective, not from a flexibility perspective. It may be good for low-power-consumption multitasking but that's not quite enough now is it. Symbian cannot be resurrected, and it should've been eased out years ago. Returning to that would be a bit like (actually, a lot like) RIM sticking to their now-antiquated OS instead of moving to QNX.

Also, Ovi is not "fine".

And finally I disagree with the point that customers would still want to buy Symbian devices. Why don't you speak to, say, 20 Symbian users who have switched to Android or iOS and ask whether they'd be willing to switch back. I have serious doubts more than one or two would.

Robert Atkins

Always nice to read knowledgable comments on Any forum.

Just read(another) article through Reuters News on Fall of Nokia. Author was Tarmo Virki, European Correspondent. He did not mention Elop, nor have I seen much mention at all of Elop's role in this fiasco. He seemed to think, like others, that Nokia just couldn't keep pace with Apple, could not produce phones that sold anymore due to Symbian.

No one seems to account for MS terrible sales so far, the Burning Platform Memo, the Skype factor, or that the phones will be designed *in California* for an American market which is a small fraction of world market. Why do so many of them seem to think MS will save Nokia, or vice versa?

Would someone send these writers and correspondents Tomi's URL, please?

Good night now.



Nokia has fantastic operator relationships - like none other. Its hardware is incomparible. Its global reach has remained unchallenged. Nokia has failed because it failed to predict what users would want in a phone beyond features. Software retention (like the App Store). Multi-usuability (ereaders, phones, music players, app launchers, etc.

The Nokia board brought in Elop to change the company and the poor decision making process. Elop was only at MSFT for a little over 2 years. Before that, he ran companies and divisions for Adobe, Juniper and Macromedia. He was a super-star. In large part, he can be credited with pushing MSFT out of a boxed-software mindset and driving its software services to the cloud. Give him a little credit here.

Give it 1 or 2 years before writing an article like this. If it's all a failure, then proudly pronounce that you knew it all along. If it succeeds, go ahead and write an article about how big a mistake you made writting this one and how you are the superb idiot who should be fired.

(P.S. I get the feeling this is more of a Microsoft-hater article than it is a Nokia-hater one. Had Nokia gone for Android as its OS, you probably would have written a very different, sympathetic article).


Well, I remember a quote (I guess by Napoleon, but not sure) that said something along the lines "Power is nothing, glory is everything."

I don't know how much Elop contributed to Nokia's power loss, because Nokia's glory faded a lot before his arrival.
- Switching to Symbian V3 and imposing certificates on the developers that wanted to innovate?
- The E90 display scratched by the keyboard when closed ?
- The N97 that was so expensive and slow ?

We are now witnessing the power loss following Nokia's glory going down. Maybe there was still some 'glory' left before Elop's arrival, but probably not enough to conserve the power.

I guess something similar happens to Sony too...
- X10 no updates of software for 1 year - a lot of frustrated customers that did not want to buy the Arc.
- Arc developing cracks 2 months after use.
- The data loss on their network ...

We'll see..

Microsoft plays smart, if they can't beat in quality - there are still other ways to win. Patents, waiting for opportunities, etc. Very good for them ...

The comments to this entry are closed.

Available for Consulting and Speakerships

  • Available for Consulting & Speaking
    Tomi Ahonen is a bestselling author whose twelve books on mobile have already been referenced in over 100 books by his peers. Rated the most influential expert in mobile by Forbes in December 2011, Tomi speaks regularly at conferences doing about 20 public speakerships annually. With over 250 public speaking engagements, Tomi been seen by a cumulative audience of over 100,000 people on all six inhabited continents. The former Nokia executive has run a consulting practise on digital convergence, interactive media, engagement marketing, high tech and next generation mobile. Tomi is currently based out of Helsinki but supports Fortune 500 sized companies across the globe. His reference client list includes Axiata, Bank of America, BBC, BNP Paribas, China Mobile, Emap, Ericsson, Google, Hewlett-Packard, HSBC, IBM, Intel, LG, MTS, Nokia, NTT DoCoMo, Ogilvy, Orange, RIM, Sanomamedia, Telenor, TeliaSonera, Three, Tigo, Vodafone, etc. To see his full bio and his books, visit Tomi Ahonen lectures at Oxford University's short courses on next generation mobile and digital convergence. Follow him on Twitter as @tomiahonen. Tomi also has a Facebook and Linked In page under his own name. He is available for consulting, speaking engagements and as expert witness, please write to tomi (at) tomiahonen (dot) com

Tomi's eBooks on Mobile Pearls

  • Pearls Vol 1: Mobile Advertising
    Tomi's first eBook is 171 pages with 50 case studies of real cases of mobile advertising and marketing in 19 countries on four continents. See this link for the only place where you can order the eBook for download

Tomi Ahonen Almanac 2009

  • Tomi Ahonen Almanac 2009
    A comprehensive statistical review of the total mobile industry, in 171 pages, has 70 tables and charts, and fits on your smartphone to carry in your pocket every day.

Alan's Third Book: No Straight Lines

Tomi's Fave Twitterati