This is a rare treat. We get occasional updates of regional market shares for smartphones but it seems almost impossible to find two such regions reported in the same quarter, and we thus can't get solid split of smartphone shipments on a regional basis. But the stars were kindly aligned for Q3 - as both Canalys reported US market shares, and Strategy Analytics reported Western European market shares for smartphones for the same quarter. Together these two regions account for half of the world's smarthphones, so we can now offer rare insights into the Top 3 smartphone makers - Nokia, RIM and Apple, on how their markets are split, by units sold (not by revenue).
Note that the two analyst houses did not report uniform total numbers - their total count of smartphones for Q3 differed by 5% (which is typical variation), so please recognize, these numbers are not directly comparable. But they are 'close enough' to give us the insights, at least to the level of a free blog story, eh?
The world according to these two analysts is split like this: Rest of the World has 50% fo all smartphones sold in Q3 of 2010 (40 Million), 26% in North America (21M) and 24% in Western Europe (19M). The total quarter was 80M
Now, Nokia - the market for their smartphones is clearly 'rest of world' because their average smartphone price is less than a third of that of Apple and about half that of RIM. Nokia's smartphones were sold 76% in Rest of World, 23% in Western Europe and only 1% of Nokia smartphones sold in North America. (Number for Rest of World is corrected on 17 Dec, thanks maxxfi for noticing the typo)
RIM's best market is North America, no surprise, where it sells 41% of its Blackberries. RIM sells 35% of its Blackberries in the Rest of the World, and 24% in Western Europe.
Apple meanwhile sells 39% of the iPhones in North America, its second best market is Western Europe where it sells 33% of all iPhones and 28% in the Rest of the World.
Fascinating. I wish we had this kind of splits reported more often. Nothing dramatically surprising to me out of the above data, very consistent with my consultancy internal analysis, and I'll be having some good regional smartphone and dumbphone data in the new upcoming TomiAhonen Phone Book that I hope to have out very soon.
Tomi, sorry but something doesn't add up:
RIM: 41 + 35 +24 = 100%
Apple: 39 + 33 + 28 = 100%
Nokia: 51 + 32 + 1 = 84 % ???
There must be a part of the world that is not included
in the Rest of the World cited in the statistics :-P
Posted by: maxxfi | December 17, 2010 at 08:22 AM
For Nokia, Tomi probably meant 51 + 32 + 17 = 100%. Just my guess
Posted by: Eric | December 17, 2010 at 10:57 AM
There is no way that Nokia is selling 17% of it's smartphones in North America....
Posted by: Gijsbertjan | December 17, 2010 at 07:01 PM
its, sorry
Posted by: Gijsbertjan | December 17, 2010 at 07:02 PM
haha, what happened? Thanks maxxfi. And no, Eric, the US smartphone penetration for Nokia is indeed 1%. Let me go through the numbers again. Sorry..
Tomi :-)
Posted by: Tomi Ahonen | December 17, 2010 at 08:37 PM
Ok, found it (and corrected it). The Rest of World number for Nokia is 76%. Sorry. I listed a number from a wrong column..
Thanks for noticing it!
Tomi :-)
Posted by: Tomi Ahonen | December 17, 2010 at 08:56 PM
Tomi,
please have another look at your table. Right now your numbers for Nokia are:
Nokia: 76% + 32% + 1% = 109%
So there is still something wrong (I assume Rest of World number is 67%).
Do you also have numbers handy how many units each of the three companies sold?
Thanks!
Posted by: Claus212 | December 17, 2010 at 11:42 PM
récapitulation des Grands, je ne peux même pas croire que vous avez pu écrire that.I eu tant d'inquiétude en train de regarder cela et je pensais que j'étais le seul qui avait la rage contre nature / haine pour Kelly, heureux je ne suis pas le seul, comme je me concerne. Ces femmes montrent que vous pouvez l'age sans m?rir.
Posted by: white iphone 4 | December 20, 2010 at 09:37 AM
I am actually surprised to see that Apple is the geographically most balanced of the top 3. They lost their US centricity; apparently after entering new countries and giving up most of their exclusive operator relationships. US percentage might increase again with the expected cdma capable iPhone.
Posted by: alex | December 20, 2010 at 04:56 PM
The big difference between US and non-US market is the pricing model by the carriers. In US a good chunk of carrier contract tend to be post paid (2 year contract) and thus the cost of the smart phone is not significant as a percentage of the total cost for 2 years. In non-US markets, a good chunk of the carrier contract tend to be pre-paid and thus the cost of the smart phone tends to be an issue. The market for smart phones outside US will tend to be very sensitive to the price of the smart phone.
Posted by: Bob Shaw | December 20, 2010 at 05:19 PM
Arghh.. yeah, thanks Claus212 - I didn't notice I apparently took all numbers from the wrong column for Nokia, and didn't see that being 32% (should have been 23%). So the numbers should have read 76%, 23% and 1% for Nokia. Now it is (finally) correct. Thank you
I will return to comment to the others later
Tomi :-)
Posted by: Tomi Ahonen | December 20, 2010 at 09:06 PM
I love you articles, he has deeply attracted me. I believe you will be published out more and more excellent works, I'm looking forward to it! Hope you can live a happy life!
Posted by: cheap Manolo Blahnik shoes | December 22, 2010 at 08:20 AM
The modern and delicate makes iphone 4 white so charming that even me, want to own one. But what i can do now, is to wait the price to decline.
Posted by: Henry Peise | December 23, 2010 at 06:42 AM
No wonder, with white iphone 4 in your hand will make you be the focus of the crowd! You won't miss it!
Posted by: white iphone 4 | December 23, 2010 at 07:15 AM
I am actually surprised to see that Apple is the geographically most balanced of the top 3. They lost their US centricity, apparently after entering new countries and giving up most of their exclusive operator relationships.
Posted by: mobile | December 23, 2010 at 09:47 AM
I believe you will be published out more and more excellent works, I'm looking forward to it! Hope you can live a happy life!
Posted by: Mobile | December 24, 2010 at 10:45 AM
Good post. I am also going to write a blog post about this...I enjoyed reading your post and I like your take on the issue.
Cheapest Football Jerseys/a>
Posted by: Cheapest Football Jerseys | December 27, 2010 at 04:00 AM
Je veux juste dire que c'est un super blog vous êtes arrivé ici! J'ai fait le tour de pas mal de temps, mais a finalement décidé de montrer mon appréciation de votre travail!
Posted by: white iphone 4 | December 28, 2010 at 02:40 AM
@Bob Shaw: that is an interesting observation. Here in Sweden, most phones are sold at subsidised cost with a 2 year contract, and I had thought that this was a common pattern in Europe at least.
When talking of non-US markets, where is the prepaid model most common? Europe, Asia or somewhere else?
/M
Posted by: Magnus | December 28, 2010 at 11:54 AM
Arghh.. yeah, thanks Claus212 - I didn't notice I apparently took all numbers from the wrong column for Nokia, and didn't see that being 32% (should have been 23%). So the numbers should have read 76%, 23% and 1% for Nokia. Now it is (finally) correct. Thank you
I will return to comment to the others later
Tomi :-)
Posted by: karen millen dresses | December 29, 2010 at 08:20 AM