I have had very heavy travel past few weeks and many items I need to cover on the blog including a couple of very interesting conferences, several very clever services and now is also the time of quarterly results for smartphone makers so there is the 'bloodbath' updates also due this month. So I will keep this short.
(Note: has addition on Oct 29, about Apple now being in Top 5)
Apple announced results for the July-September quarter (Q3 in calendar quarters). The iPhone unit sales exceeded most expectations and reached 14.1 million units. The unit sales had remained flat for the previous three quarters at about 8.4 million to 8.75 million and obviously the 14.1 million level is a record for Apple.
As to market share, 14.1 million units gives Apple roughly a 20% market share in smartphones, a huge jump from 13% in the previous quarter and exceeding Apple's previous peak market share a year before of 17%.
If previous patterns hold, and Apple only continue to release one new iPhone model per year, then this level of sales of about 14 million iPhones per quarter would mean annual sales of about 45 million for the full calendar year 2010. Counting back 12 months (as the July-September quarter is Apple's fiscal fourth quarter), Apple has sold 40 million iPhones in the past year, a big number.
There are several significant milestones that happened this quarter. First of all, most obviously, Apple passed RIM for the first time ever, now that the iPhone outsold the Blackberry for this quarter. Do recall that RIM also grew sales for this past quarter, and RIM has been growing unit sales every quarter quarter-on-quarter, so if the previous pattern holds, and Apple sales are now going to be flat for the next 3 quarters, RIM may claw back its lead and return to being the second-biggest smartphone maker around Q1 of 2011. But Apple's current lead over RIM is considerable so its unlikely RIM could jump back to second place during this current 'Christmas' Quarter of October to December.
(This para is added on 29 October, sorry for missing it out originally..) Secondly - Apple has now crashed into the Top 5 of global handset makers! It was just a year ago that Apple entered the top 10 handset makers, as the second of the 'pure smartphone makers' to enter the chart where obviously the cheaper dumbphones would dominate due to their volumes of sales. But now Apple has leapfrogged RIM, and it depends essentially on ZTE performance, on whether Apple is 4th or 5th, and whether the last of the top 5 is ZTE or RIM. But Apple is definitely now one of the world's 5 largest mobile phone manufacturers. This is an astonishing achievement considering that they only make smartphones, that the unsubsidised price of the iPhone is about 5 times more than the average of all phones sold worldwide, and most of all, that Apple has managed this with only one new phone model released per year! (imagine how much more market success Apple would have, if the decided to expand their product line and introduce say a lower cost 'iPhone Nano' model and release two new phones per year..) The top 3 are far beyond Apple's reach for now, where Nokia sells 110 million per quarter, Samsung over 60 million and LG about 30 million. But Apple is certainly in the Top 5, and may be as high as the 4th biggest mobile phone manufacturer worldwide, this past quarter. Considering there are about 40 major manufacturers globally, including many that have been in this business for more than a decade (Motorola, Sony and Ericsson, Alcatel, Panasonic, Sharp, etc) - and that Apple achieved it in only 3 years, this is a truly remarkable achievement. Congratulations Apple. Do not listen to the grumpy old man over at Communities Dominate blog, just keep doing what you are doing, and you will continue to change the world of mobile for the better. I take my hat off and salute you!
Thirdly, less obviously, Apple achieved a major milestone in quarterly sales. Yes, it passed the 10 million smartphone unit sales level per quarter - by a wide margin too - but more relevantly, three years ago in 2007 the July-September quarter was the first full quarter of iPhone sales. So the iPhone has only been sold now for 12 full quarters (3 years). And the original sales target for the iPhone for its first year, was to sell 10 million iPhones (something that I believed in, and obviously something that happened). Now just three years later, Apple sells over 10 million iPhones per quarter. That is impressive.
There is another milestone that the 14.1 million level achieves. It is that Apple has now achieved the level of selling 'more than half' of the biggest smartphone maker, Nokia. Nokia sold 26.5 million smartphones in the third quarter, and has in the past sold so many more smartphones, that the second biggest smartphone maker (which for the past four years has been RIM) never sold half the level of Nokia. Now Apple has achieved that level and is obviously closing on Nokia, even as Nokia too is growing unit sales.
WHO IS BIGGEST COMPUTER MAKER?
Looking a bit beyond just mobile phones, Apple also is gobbling up market share in personal computers. Apple does not break out the iPod Touch unit sales, but analysts suggest the iPod Touch sales levels have been at about 60% of the level of iPhones. So we could estimate that for Q3 the amount of iPod Touch'es sold was about 8.5 million.
When we add 4.1 million iPad sales and 3.9 million Mac PCs, we get to a combined 30.6 million personal computers of any kind, if smartphones are included in the definition of computers sold. Bear in mind, that is how all of the big 6 PC makers now define the smartphone, that it is a computer. So where just three years ago Apple wasn't even in the top 5 biggest PC makers if only counting the Mac sales, this quarter's performance in computer sales would give Apple an annual level of about 122.4 million computers sold - thats twice the level of what the world's biggest computer maker, Hewlett-Packard sold worldwide last year! Even Nokia making only smartphones cannot now match the quarterly performance of computers of all kind, sold by Apple. The difference is that clever bit of niche marketing Apple did with the market positioning of the gadget they introduced to us as the iPad.
Now, this is the milestone moment for Apple in Q3, it is not the actual final count for the full calendar year 2010 (they may get that too, but we won't know until Q4 numbers are reported). As of now, going forward, Apple is the world's biggest computer maker and will be so over the next 12 months. Whether it actually achieves that during calendar 2010 remains to be seen, but Apple is so far ahead of HP, that if we use the reasoning that smartphones are computers, and by that logic for calendar year 2009, Apple was third biggest behind HP and Nokia, this year definitely Apple has grown bigger than HP in making computers (congratulations!). Not bad as a come-back by those guys who made the original Apple PC all those decades ago, and who were counted by many as utterly dead as computer makers when they were producing quarter after quarter of losses in the 1990s, or whose market share in computers was counted as about 3% as recently as 2006. Must be a sweet feeling over there in Cupertino, the come-back kids, eh? Also a sense of irony, that Apple dropped 'computer' from its corporate name only three years ago, to then re-emerge and become the planet's biggest computer maker..
A bit moment for Apple. And regardless of exactly when the full-year numbers will tell the story, from this point on, Apple is definitely the world's biggest computer maker, where with Macs, iPads and iPod Touch'es helping the iPhone outsell Nokia branded smartphones and computers - and both giant smartphone makers dwarfing HP, Dell, Acer and other more PC oriented computer makers. Congratulations Apple the world's biggest computer maker, and for passing RIM to take second place in smartphones in only 3 years from launch - and selling more smartphones now in one quarter, than they did in their first full year - that itself a world record launch of a new branded mobile phone at the time.
Hi Tomi,
My you've changed your tone from 6-9 months ago, when predicting iPhone in decline and BlackBerry entrenched, and no mea culpa!
I reckon I read those two trends (plus LG) somewhat better ;-), though we both got well and truly blindsided by Android's astonishing ascendancy this year (I wasn't anticipating until 2011 at the earliest) plus you seem to read Samsung very well and your strident defence of Nokia looks more justified (albeit now with a North American, Microsoftie CEO doing a clear-out!).
But now you've gone and one-upped me by leafrogging my argument for a distinct mobile computer category and gone all-computer. Worse, I think you're actually spot on there (and what fun to laud Apple as #1 in a world of Windows!), though I'd argue that Nokia (Symbian/S60) and BlackBerry are not remotely in this space as they're basically glorified featurephone platforms compared to Android/iOS. MeeGo, yes, but that's still a pipedream in the mass-market. Interesting to see if QNX (PlayBook OS) marks RIM's return to competitiveness.
This all said, like you (?), I can still see Apple stumbling in 2011 unless it gets real about product range, launch cycles, sales channels, pricing, control, etc. I'm also not yet convinced by tablets as a long-lasting mainstream category (worse than mobiles, worse than netbooks...why?). Smaller 7" tablets, maybe (i.e. perhaps Amazon's Kindle marked a quiet revolution, not iPad with is blaze of glory). Still, I need to see what Samsung and iPad v2 do before passing serious judgement. Ironically, Apple may inadvertently have rammed home the iPad's dubiousness with its own new $999 MacBook Air netbook looking so far ahead on capabilities, value, design, etc. Just needs a full-flip touchscreen and 3G and the iPad is decimated. Apple's plan, presumably, is to lure iPhone users into the Mac range, which leaves the question of where Apple sees itself positioned long term -- premium niche or mass-market?
By the way, are you coming around yet to my thinking that Android and iOS could crack the enterprise sooner rather than later? Widening the computing category, cloud, and consumerisation all play into accelerated market evolution, imo.
Posted by: Alex Birkhead | October 26, 2010 at 01:20 PM
Doesn't really change the conclusions, but total Ipod sales were at a notch over 9m units. If Touch sold 8.5m units, that'd leave shuffles ($50), nanos ($150) and classics together only some half a million. Doesn't sound plausible. Who made that estimation?
Posted by: sami | October 26, 2010 at 03:41 PM
How do you estimate Apple market share is 20 percent when you do not know android sales ? I think Android phone sales have cracked 20 million in Q3 let see
Posted by: Bob | October 26, 2010 at 05:19 PM
Sami and Tomi - I recall that the "iPod touch are 60% of iPhone unit sales" estimate is a bit older and outdated. iPhone sales have grown more rapidly than iPod touch sales, so it should be well less than 60%. You can find could analysis on Apple numbers at asymco. E.g. estimate of 120 M total installed based of iOS devices.
Posted by: alex | October 27, 2010 at 03:58 AM
@Lee,
interesting look at the other column in strategy analytics, I think other is mainly android, as there are lesser number of windows mobile, webOS, Bada sold
Posted by: Bob | October 27, 2010 at 04:10 AM
Hi Tomi,
Firstly I should declare that I work for Nokia, but anything I say here is my own opinion.
Having said that all I wanted to say was that Strategy Analytics reports that the total Smartphone market this quarter was 77 million, so 14.1 million for Apple is 18.3%, not 20%. That means an increase of 1.3% YOY.
Just an observation.
Posted by: Phil W | October 27, 2010 at 04:13 PM
@Bob
I don't think the remaining 31 percent of the market is "mainly android". You have Symbian phones from other vendors - even though most vendors are phasing Symbian out, that should account for a couple of percent. Windows Mobile should be at around 5 to 7 percent and then there are various Linux-based operating systems - including WebOS from Palm, Bada from Samsung and LiMo. That should be around 4 percent or so. There are also a bunch of other operating systems that have pretty low market share but should amount to another percent or so of the market.
So I'd guess Android's worldwide share in Q3 2010 is somewhere between 17 to 19 percent - about the same as that of the iPhone. Add to that the fact that iPhone's strongest quarters are Q3 and Q4 while Android sales tend to be more evenly spread out and it looks as if Android has, in fact, overtaken the iPhone in worldwide sales. However, since Android's numbers tend to be dominated by their US sales, it remains to be seen what the effect on their sales will be if the iPhone does, in fact, move to Verizon in 2011.
It also remains to be seen what effect Windows Phone 7 sales will have on all of this. Later in 2011, we also have Nokia coming out with MeeGo and Symbian^4 - so 2011 looks to be quite interesting for the smartphone market.
- HCE
Posted by: HCE | October 27, 2010 at 05:25 PM
@ sami iPod Touchs are not included under iPod sales. iPod touch sales are reckoned to be 45% of all iOS sales.
Posted by: Brian | October 27, 2010 at 09:21 PM
Sami and Tomi - I recall that the "iPod touch are 60% of iPhone unit sales" estimate is a bit older and outdated. iPhone sales have grown more rapidly than iPod touch sales, so it should be well less than 60%. You can find could analysis on Apple numbers at asymco. E.g. estimate of 120 M total installed based of iOS devices.
Cash For Gold Belfast
Posted by: mark edward | October 27, 2010 at 11:57 PM
Steve Jobs recently said that iPod touch is now over half of all iPods sold. As sami said, there were just over 9m iPods sold this past quarter, so iPod touch was somewhere between 4.5 and 5m, alongside 14.1m iPhones, 4.2m iPads, and 3.9m Macs, or over 27m "computers" in the quarter.
For the Christmas quarter, I'd project that this total will be over 30m, and much closer to 35m. I fully expect more than 14.1m iPhones sold, as supply is no longer constrained, and distribution expands further globally. Looking further forward, if iPhone goes to Verizon (and possibly China Telecom and others) in Q1 2011, the flat/down Q1 pattern will be broken as well, as Verizon should sell at least 3m iPhones in its first quarter. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised to see Apple sell 75-80m iPhones alone in CY 2011.
About Android, I think it's reasonable to expect 18-19m Android-based phone to have been sold this quarter. Strategy Analytics' public releases have estimates for the 3 largest mfrs (Nokia, Apple, RIM) and Other. The Other category jumped from 15.9m units in Q2 to 24.1m in Q3; it's likely that that growth (plus a bit more) is all Android, just like it was the previous quarter. Canalys estimated 10.7m Android units (and Gartner estimated 10.6m) in Q2, so 18-19m is likely. We'll know more in a few hours when both HTC and Samsung reports. HTC, Motorola, and Samsung are the three largest global makers of Android-based phones, and combined, they should sell 12-13m Android-based units in the quarter.
Looking forward, the other qualification here is that Verizon (very likely the largest seller of Android-based phones) has been running a Buy One Get One Free promotion for Droid phones since Christmas 2008, just like they did previously for Blackberry. Verizon has also spent 100s of millions on advertising for Droid; if they get iPhone in Q1 of 2011, can they afford to also keep spending so heavily on Droid?
Posted by: kevin | October 29, 2010 at 04:42 AM
Hi everybody
Thank you for the comments. I will return to answer all of you, please keep the comments coming
PS - for those who posted early on, please note, I forgot to mention in the original blog that Apple also has crashed into the Top 5 biggest mobile phone manufacturers, so there is an added paragraph in the blog article.
Tomi Ahonen :-)
Posted by: Tomi Ahonen | October 29, 2010 at 03:11 PM
Regarding the iPod Touch sales, in the Back to the Mac event Steve Jobs stated that Apple has sold 19 million FaceTime enabled devices so far, and since the only FaceTime devices before the event were the iPhone 4 and the iPod Touch 4rd generation, that gives a bit under 5 million sales for the iPod Touch. That would mean about 38% of the iPhone sales so the share is definitely a lot less than it used to be.
Posted by: Mikko Martikainen | October 29, 2010 at 08:44 PM
@Mikko
Remember that the 4th generation iPod Touch was released only in early September while the iPhone 4 was released in late June. So, you are comparing 4 months of iPhone sales to about a month and a half of iPod Touch sales. If you look at sales per month, you'll find that the iPod Touch is selling at only a slightly slower rate than the iPhone.
- HCE
Posted by: HCE | October 29, 2010 at 09:14 PM
I'm not going to pretend I understand the numbers. I do understand that phones are now computers, and home servers are now internet appliances. It makes my head hurt, trying to keep up!
Posted by: Joey1058 | October 30, 2010 at 07:49 AM
@HCE
You're right, I didn't take that into account though I knew of it. Some kind of brain disconnect on my part. Anyway, given the other figures posted here, it seems like iPod Touch sales pretty were pretty much dead before the release of the 4rd generation devices.
Posted by: Mikko Martikainen | November 01, 2010 at 08:08 AM
Milestone. gives a bit under 5 million sales for the iPod Touch. That would mean about 38% of the iPhone sales so the share is definitely a lot less than it used to be.
Posted by: Wireless headsets | November 02, 2010 at 04:07 PM
Ok, will start with directed replies, each by name
Hi Alex, Leebase, sami, Bob and Phil
Alex - many good comments. Let me take the point about MeeGo being a pipe-dream for Nokia. I've been saying that for legacy dumbphone makers, they have a far easier time converting customers to smartphones than the pure smartphone makers have in building market success. And the best example we have as a case study is the late-commer Samsung. They sold 7.9 million smartphones in Q3, up from about 3 million in Q2. They sold over 6 million Galaxy smartphones and about 1.5 million Bada phones in the quarter. The point? They sell 77 million total phones, so this is roughly speaking one in ten Samsung devices sold worldwide, that is now a smartphone, when last year same time, they were touch-screen featurephones.
Nokia can do - assuming reasonably well executed transition - the exact same, by migrating mid-price and top-price Symbian phone users, on their next natural upgrade point, to a new MeeGo phone, almost automatically. Most mass market consumers don't know or care what operating system a smartphone has, and many won't even care whether it is a smartphone or not, as long as its a certain brand, has certain features, and they can get it within their budget. When Nokia starts to migrate top end N-Series phones to MeeGo phones, this will be a relatively easy transition, and then, just like Samsung now, Nokia will just roll the MeeGo OS down to lower cost devices, mid-priced smartphones first, etc, and will retain roughly the same percentage of return customers, as they do now. The point will be more whether a given phone model is acceptable, than what OS it has - because only Nokia and Samsung have the carrier relationships where they can do this 'automatically' and still gain global market share. RIM, Apple, HTC, SonyEricsson, Motorola etc don't have the footprint with carriers to be able to do that, as a 'de facto' OS where the handset maker simply decides which it will be, and will be guaranteed major market share by migrating dumbphones/lower cost smartphones. In my view haha...
On your question about enterprise - no, am still 100% convinced, its a three-way race where RIM has lion's share globally, Nokia E-series is strong outside of the Americas and Microsoft will have some presence in the Americas. But iPhone and Android will be tiny irrelevant bit-players. They will gain so few global enterprise/corporate customers, that they'll celebrate each with a press release, like the EU parliament decision for the iPhone this summer. It will be that rare.
Leebase - the iPad may be cracking enterprises, but look at its total share of PCs, it is still meaningless in the big picture to anyone except Apple. And I have no numbers, but I'm willing to bet that the majority of iPads are sold to consumers, not enterprises (at this early point). If for no other reasons, corporations need to budget for technology, so you'd start to see the iPad in any meaningful numbers in budgets earliest next year..
You asked for the Android numbers. Canalys has just given them yesterday, Android sold 20 million units of smartphones in Q3 of 2010. Biggest Android makers are Samsung and HTC running neck to neck. Motorola and SonyEricsson are far behind selling half their levels. The others are tiny.
sami - thanks! The projection was mine and done in a hurry and I didn't do the sanity check. Sorry about that. Clearly 8 million is too much for iPod Touch, probably reality is about half that number? I have to go change the blog article. Thanks sami!
Bob - I estimate market share based on my own company TomiAhonen Consulting forecasting model of the global handset (and global smartphone) sales. That I always adjust when latest data comes in. The 20% market share was based on the first reported Q3 total smartphone market size, which was reported at 70 million. Since then we've had better sources say Q3 smartphone sales were 77 million (Strategy Analytics) by which Apple's market share would be about 18%, and 80.9 million (Canalys) by which Apple's market share is about 17%. I wait until we have all 4 major analysts reporting, and as usual on this blog, will review the total market for Q3.
Phil - thanks, and see above, I know the Strategy Analytics number has already come out as has Canalys. I am awaiting the last 2 of the big 4 analyst houses, IDC and Gartner to report their smartphone total market size for Q3, and when I have those, I will average them as my official TomiAhonen Consulting view of the market, which sometimes has some fudge factors if I don't completely agree with that final number. But yes, I monitor all the big analyst houses and take their input into refining my model for the quarterly data.
Thank you all for writing, I will respond to more comments soon
Tomi Ahonen :-)
Posted by: Tomi Ahonen | November 02, 2010 at 04:58 PM
Ok, more replies (sorry for severe delays, but its been really hectic)
Hi HCE, Brian, mark, kevin, Mikko
HCE - thanks. Yes, I'll do the full analysis of the handset makers and by OS. I have the raw data, but haven't yet had time to do the complete analysis. Hopefully soon
Brian - iPod Touch cannot be 45% of all iOS sales because total iPod sales numbers don't support that percentage (according to Q3 numbers) see my earlier comment in the above
mark - good point about it being older, but also the asymco number is not installed base, is total cumulative shipments. Installed base is severely less than that
kevin - thanks for your forecasts for Q4, we will soon see haha. About Android, the number came out soon after you posted that comment and is 20M (you were very close..) About Q1, we will have of course the China Syndrome so iPhone will not experience a big decline and may well have sales level to Q4 amounts. Finally, on VZ iPhone, remember its only the USA, so its only about a third of Apple's total sales, and thus VZ alone won't really make huge dent to iPhone global numbers. Yes, it will help, but not very dramatically, so I think your overall expectation for 2011 numbers is a bit optimistic, but we'll see..
Mikko - thanks the 5M iPod Touch rough estimate is far more reasonable.
Thank you all for writing. I will return with more
Tomi Ahonen :-)
Posted by: Tomi Ahonen | November 18, 2010 at 04:18 PM
Brian - iPod Touch cannot be 45% of all iOS sales because total iPod sales numbers don't support that percentage (according to Q3 numbers) see my earlier comment in the above
mark - good point about it being older, but also the asymco number is not installed base, is total cumulative shipments. Installed base is severely less than that
Posted by: Seo blogger | December 15, 2010 at 02:03 PM
J'ai récemment commencé à utiliser le blogengine.net et je avoir des problèmes ici? sur votre blog vous dites que nous avons besoin pour permettre à des autorisations d'écriture sur
Posted by: iphone 4 white | December 20, 2010 at 08:56 AM