My Photo

Ordering Information

Tomi on Twitter is @tomiahonen

  • Follow Tomi on Twitter as @tomiahonen
    Follow Tomi's Twitterfloods on all matters mobile, tech and media. Tomi has over 8,000 followers and was rated by Forbes as the most influential writer on mobile related topics

Book Tomi T Ahonen to Speak at Your Event

  • Contact Tomi T Ahonen for Speaking and Consulting Events
    Please write email to tomi (at) tomiahonen (dot) com and indicate "Speaking Event" or "Consulting Work" or "Expert Witness" or whatever type of work you would like to offer. Tomi works regularly on all continents

Tomi on Video including his TED Talk

  • Tomi on Video including his TED Talk
    See Tomi on video from several recent keynote presentations and interviews, including his TED Talk in Hong Kong about Augmented Reality as the 8th Mass Media


Blog powered by Typepad

« Picture 4 in Nokia Saga: How Badly the Promised Migration from Symbian to Windows Phone is Failing | Main | Picture 5 in Nokia Mess - How Hype, Hope and Hysteria Hide the Sad Truth - Lumia Sales Pattern »

January 15, 2013



@Tester, RottenApple


@John Waclawsky, Doke

I appreciate your effort, but it IS offtopic to this article. 'Nokia' or 'Windows Phone' is not even mentioned in this blog post. If you have anything to say post it to the corresponding article or wait for the next one to arrive.

Moderation requested.

Pete Austin

A lot of technologies outnumber people, if you count the individual items: knives, drinking vessels, food plates, shoes, etc..

newbie reader

// knives, drinking vessels, food plates, shoes

difference is, all of these could be reproduced by village, or small mediveal city, economy, with no more than some thousands of population. And many could be done by 1 person, or by his family/relatives.

While mobile is 'true advanced' /i.e. complicated, global/ tech.

It requires millions of people, rather advanced knowledge and huge chunk of 20th century level tech. Forget city-level, even most of smaller countries would probably be unable to reproduce it now on their own, even if they try.


Stephen Elop in the top 5 worst CEO of 2012 according to CNBC (page 3 = about Elop)

newbie reader

Japan: Google's Nexus 7 had 44% of the market versus the iPad's 40%

Apple iPad lost the number one in Japan for the first time since 2010

newbie reader

USA 2013Q1 consumer demand for iPhone5 drops to pre-release level.

Buyers, who plan to buy iPhone over next 90 days:

sep'11, 65% /iP4S release peak/
dec'11, 54%
mar'12, 56%
jun'12, 50%
sep'12, 71% /iP5 release peak/
dec'12, 50%

plan to buy Samsung phone over next 90 days:
jun'12, 19%
sep'12, 13%
dec'12, 21%

So, if we trust these numbers,
iP5 is losing the battle to Sammy, returning to pre-release lows, on its own weight. SGS4 has not even announced yet.
Also note that higher percentage of iPhone buyers buys older model, compared to iP4S release.

And that funny guy, Baron95, talks about 'less peaky business' here :)

John Waclawsky

I appreciate the advice @lasko, ...maybe I am working under a misconception that this is a blog about Nokia in general. And any comments regarding Nokia in the context of the latest post by Tomi were always appropriate. Is there some blog structure that I am missing?

Personally, I think Tomi's numbers are fascinating and I believe one of the reasons he posts them is to see if anyone has some interesting analysis beyond world pencil production and bibles ...specifically analysis to Nokia and the mobile ecosystem in general and what Nokia is going to do / should do in the upcoming reality. My take, which I posted is that Tomi's numbers point to an increasing broken microsoft business model. So why did nokia get in bed with microsoft? ...and how will they move forward when it becomes painfully obvious that microsoft is way to extinction (it sure seems obvious now when you consider microsoft phone and tablet sales).

@rottenapple If you think I am being too hard on microsoft please feel free to explain how wonderful they are for Nokia :-) All my posts are truthful and typically have links to the exact same conclusions that I am drawing. I am just reflecting some common viewpoints that are easily found by a little searching ...using google would be best ;-) Hopefully capitalizing NO ONE WANTS A WINDOWS PHONE OR TABLET isn't bothering you too much. It is meant to annoy the trolls. But, please feel free to defend microsoft if you have some corrections.

I tried to provide some information that is at times hard to fit into the topic for example @newbie reader is doing a good job correcting Baron95 but if you really want to know what was behind Nokia recent stock increase I previously posted some analysis that provides some interesting background and perspective about Nokia recent stock movement at

of course blog readers have to read it to get a bigger and i believe a fascinating picture of what/who is currently manipulating Nokia's stock price. But these kinds of "current events" posts often span multiple blog topics. My two cents... and I am sorry if I annoyed anyone but the microsoft astroturfers and trolls. :-)


@John Waclawsky
"Hopefully capitalizing NO ONE WANTS A WINDOWS PHONE OR TABLET isn't bothering you too much. It is meant to annoy the trolls."

Actually, your capitalized soundbite has the effect to "cure" Google searches from the poisoning of the trolls. One primary aim of all the troll comments is to ensure that any critical comments are drowned in "positive" remarks in search results. Your repeated soundbite works as an anti-dote.

newbie reader

Consumer Reports:

iP5 is ranked 3rd for AT&T and Sprint, below SGS3, and is not even in Top 3 for Verizon.

1. LG Optimus
2. SGS3
3. iP5

1. LG Optimus
2. SGS3
3. iP5

1. SGS3
2. HTC One S
3. Note2

1. Moto Razr Maxx
2. Moto Razr
3. SGS3

/ And my pick would be: Verizon HTC DNA /

John Waclawsky

@winter. I agree. :-) Also, you can see my point in the drum beat of the press almost daily that NO ONE WANTS A WINDOWS PHONE OR TABLET. I can point out as a current example:

I also think the trolls would like to distract us to run off on tangents too.

I really don't know how grown adults at Nokia who are supposed to be industry smart and understand long term strategy and short term tactics can make such blatant going out of business choices and stick with microsoft posion, especially in light of all the statistics and analysis by Tomi.

John Waclawsky

More press discovering that NO ONE WANTS A WINDOWS TABLET :-)

newbie reader

SGS4 Antutu test leak, says it has octa-core A15/A7 CPU


I'm posting this for the old MS astroturfer trools that say Apple user never change to android:

this guy is an APPLE TROOL, he goes to betanews to DEFEND apple, but after he try SGN2, he's change.

2. Nexus 7 beat ipad:

Is this real or joke?:



About 1: Great find. And the article perfectly highlights what went wrong at Apple. Instead of revolutionizing smartphone use again all we got since the iPhone 4 was minor incremental improvements but no real innovation - not even an acknowledgement of how the market developed. When the first iPhone was released it had a huge screen compared to the competition, its user interface was by far the most advancved. But now? Android has caught up in all areas, and then produced something new like the Galaxy Note II. Samsung has managed to create something that's in its own league, far above the iPhone. The funniest thing here is that the entire industry and many 'experts' were mocking Samsung for creating such a monster. But it seems it was Samsung who did their research well. Let's wait what Apple releases this year - but it has to be a very significant improvement over the iPhone 5.

About 3: Haha. This is a terrific example of how to manipulate presentation of statistics. Have you noticed how the scales of the 2 things being compared don't even closely match? (IE use declined by half, murders by 1/7th) I guess you could create a similar picture with any other value that has been constantly declining for several years.


@Newbie_Reader Why are you dragging me into a blog post that I'm not even commenting? You are one of the least bad posters here (at least you post interesting data and makes a reasonable argument), so I'll respond.

A - I said that ANDROID had peaked in the US. I never said that Samsung had peaked. Samsung as the Android winner will peak much, much later than Android as a whole.

B - The Samsung bounce up is due to the Note II launch (almost as big a Galaxy launch in the US). Nothing there.

C - The iPhone 5 launch in the US is nothing short of phenomenal. No matter how many thousands of words anyone writes. The data is clear. Highest iPhone peak ever 71% of all smartphones. Apple alone selling more smartphones that all other vendors (not just Android) combined in Q4. The drop 90 days out is simple to explain. Apple has become much, much, much better at meeting demand much more quickly after a launch. The iPhone 5 went quickly into near supply-demand balance in the US. So less people had to wait months to get one.

The challenges for Apple on the iPhone continue to be the same. Exclusion from key operators like China Mobile, DoCoMo, T-Mobile USA, and affordability.

As to Tomi's post, he confuses mobile activations with mobile subscription. In fact, there are less than 1.5B true mobile subscription (a monthly plan subscription for a device used by a human as a mobile device) on the planet.

In my house, the water meter and the electric meter both have a mobile link to report outages or consumption. Those are not visible, nor used by humans. If you were to count these things, then bar-codes, for example are in hundreds of billions of products per year. Even NFC tags are in tens ob billions of products already.

Other than that, with Tomi tolerating span from the likes of John Wacko (because it happens to advance his distorted view), and deleting those that disagree with his view, this blog is near unreadable. Even coming here for some laughs on the Linux guys predictions is no longer worth it.


Incidentally, the massive losses of Android OEMs have begun. ZTE issued a warning of massive losses in Q4, which will turn the entire year 2012 negative, on what? That is right - mobile phone losses.

If Tomi wants to wright about bloodbath, the bloodbath will start in late 2013 and 2014. It is not a unit count bloodbath. It will be a profit bloodbath for OEMs and then for operators.

For OEMs, there will be a horde of Android plastic phone OEMs on a race to the bottom, a couple of niche players RIM/Windows trying to escape the race to the bottom (likely unsuccessfully) and Apple, alone, selling glass and aluminum, premium phone for the well to do, credit card iTunes crowd.

OEMs will suffer, with Apple, Google, Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft, etc offering the high value services, and they becoming a dumb pipe.

Tomi's favorite SMS revenues have peaked. In spain for instance, SMS revenues have dropped by 2/3, for 400M euros/quarter to 170M euros/quarter. In the US, SMS revenues are now impossible to measure, as unlimited SMS is a bundle on the total subscription price for smartphones and most other phones. So it is a table stakes give away.

Those are the trends that Tomi should be writing about. Instead, he will be reporting them in 2016 after it is all done, and OEMs and Operators become commodity device/access suppliers to Apple, Google, Microsoft, Facebook, Amazon, etc.


So you see competition as the death of the free market.

Interesting viewpoint on economic development.


@Baron95 All that with SMS revenew and Operators becoming commodity device/access suppliers.

In Denmark Europe we have had unlimited SMS/MMS for years.
We can no be bound in a phone contract for more then 6 month. And after that the carrier has to unlock the phone for free.
So for a long time it has been cheaper if you just got the phone off contract (some that do not do the math still buys with a contract) and most carriers has stopped offering "discount" on phones and just added. buy you phone and pay it over 6 to 24 month (They still have to unlock it after 6 month and you can stop you carrier contract after no longer then 6 month)

So I can get
3 hours talk time (it only count when I call out. I can receive unlimited time at no cost)
Unlimited SMS/MMS
3GB Data
And free talk to all others on the same carrier for 17.67 US$ and is only locked in the contract to the first of next month

Free talk to all
Unlimited SMS/MMS
22GB Data
for 65.85 US$ and is only locked in the contract to the first of next month

And on both if I use more data then that. Then they will lower my data speed. But not charge extra.
And of cause there are also some plans in between.

The cool thing with not allowing the carrier to bind a person for longer then 6 month and that there phones has to be unlocked for free after the 6 month is that carriers and competing on there service and price. And the ones that only binds you to the first in next month is doing so. Because to want to show that they want to be the best, and want you to stay because you like there service.
And that phone makers has to compete on quality and price. And not just because they made a good deal with a carrier.

About you water and electric meter. Did you notice that the article says " phone ACCOUNTS outnumber humans...." and that Tomi in the article wrote "..... and as some of the mobile accounts are actually machine-accounts (electric meters, watering irrigation systems, healthcare warning systems etc) the actual number of 'unique users' as human beings is well below that magical number"

So he do know that. And just because you cant see your water meter's "phone" then it still needs an account to communicate.

About Android phones are plastic phones and are on a race to the bottom and glass and aluminium are the only premium phones.
Glass and aluminium are heavy compared to more modern materials. And the plastic that phones are made of today are not the plastic that you use for bottles or warping.
It's is made it take the beating a phones is getting when you use it. And be light weight.
It's like saying that plans not build of wood and cloth materials as in the good OLD days. And some cheap crap planes. And only the mostly handmade wood and cloth planes are quality.

Things evolves and if you do not evolve in same speed with the rest of them. You have to learn to catch up quick or get left behind and get extinct.
And that is where people are commenting on the iPhone. It's has not really evolved sins the iPhone 4. So catch up quick or get extinct.


@winter - No, but I see competition only on commodity prices, usually leading to low margin and possible losses.

There is no way that GM will ever have the same margins as BMW if they ONLY compete on commodity vs premium cars. So, it is more likely that GM will incur losses, than BMW.

It is more likely that Android OEMs will incur losses than Apple.


Not a value (good vs bad) judgement. Just business.


@Henrik - NO - you have NOT had unlimited SMS for 6 years. Travel around Europe and you will be hit with astronomical SMS fees (measured by price per byte).

With iMessage and the like you truly do have unlimited SMS anywhere, anytime, even when not on a cellular network, even to non phone devices like iPads and Macs.

It was this seachange that is forcing operators to change - and their days of extortion in advanced markets are numbered. They may get another 5-10 years tops.

The value WILL move from controlling operators (e.g. DoCoMo iMode, FOMA) to the Internet providers - Rovio, Facebook, Apple iTunes, google, etc.


@Henrik - further commenting on your post - what you are also experiencing is the same old, over regulated European schemes, that restrict your choice. The same over regulation that gifted Nokia (and for a time Ericsson, Siemens, Alcatel, etc) with the rigid GSM standard and frequencies that made them lead the 2G transition, but is now making Europe a LTE laggard.

Why would your government prevent an operator and a consumer into having a 2year subsidize contract with a locked for life phone. It should be a free market. If some consumers want a subsidize phone and want a contract, so be it. I'll tell you EXACTLY a case in point. Many Americans (and quite a few Europeans) have their phone bills payed by their Employers, and could care less (as consumers) how much they pay. But they do want to get new devices (typically owned by them) every 18 months or so. So the subsidy model is perfect for those consumers. Why should government limit choices?

It is ridiculous - this obsession of many Europeans (and the regulators you elect) to one size fits all, will have very bad long term consequences.

Good luck to you.

John Waclawsky

The reality is the real suffering is occurring in the Microsoft eco-system. The fact that NO ONE WANTS A WINDOWS PHONE OR TABLET doesn't mean they are not popular. On the contrary but not using microsoft software. In fact sales are migrating from the Microsoft eco-system to Android and Apple.

newbie reader

// Why are you dragging me

It's my little "daemon invocation rite", calling you by name :)

That Waclawsky guy also made me bored. And I just thought, we need here a better troll than he is, a real PRO clown... Someone, whose ass we all can kick, inteligent way, and not that BORING TRUTH prophet of NOBODY WANTS A WINDOWS PHONE :) And I thought, Baron95 would fit perfectly!

Ok, seriously, the data I quoted is clear, it predicts Apple biz in USA to be MORE peaky, not less.

Higher high, 71% vs. 65%,
is followed by lower low, 50% vs. 56%

I call this MORE peaky.

That's why I recalled you, AAPL bull, to see once again, that your best points are still weak.

And, to add to AAPL trouble, subsidy game in USA also got endangered recently.

newbie reader

// So you see competition as the death of the free market.
// Interesting viewpoint on economic development.

Yes! :)
But it is not just him, it is a common trend.

"free market competition", once praised, is called these days "race to the bottom"

And "decent, healthy business" are cartels, locks and monopoly game

What was once "design" is now called "innovation",

while "innovation" is called "disruptive technology"

and, to top it all, development of cheaper and better competing product is called horrible "cannibalization".

The truth is, Corporate USA is no longer competetive worldwide, and it is mostly cornered in the high-end of the market. Anything new means now only losses for them, and anything cheaper also means losses for them, and free market competition means losses for them. So, this change of the words and attitudes.


@Baron95 I never said that we have had unlimited SMS for 6 years. I'm saying that we have it now and that we have had it for some time.

Travelling around Europe, or general just outside your country will cost roaming fees that is the same as if a person for the USA travels outside the US.
And then yes SMS cost money but so do data. so iMessenge er nit truly unlimited SMS anywhere, anytime.
Try and look at the price for data roaming. And if you say "I'm always on wifi" then you have not travelt.

And yes we are lagging a little behind on 4G but we have 32+ mbit/s 3G and the HSPA+ that I notice is sometimes called 4G in the US. That is just 3G here in Europe and we had that for quite some time.

And the hole part about why bother that you get locked for 2 years. Someone else is paying you bill anyway.
Sure if someone else pays my bills I would not care what stuff cost. But for many they pay them self.

And what's wrong with the government protect there citizens.
They did not do anything to begin with. But they know how important communication are. And then the price did not go down when the cost of operation did. Then they start making regulations to protect there citizens.
By making a law that they could not bind people that long they made the carriers compete. They did not force them to lower there prices. But they made it so people could see the real price. And people started to pick what was cheapest. And leaving carriers they did not like.
And the carriers had to make better products to keep and gain costumers.
What is better 10 costumers that you earn 100$ from each or 1000$ that you only earn 20$ form each?

Ohh and about regulations. Data roaming in Europe is for me 1.16 US$ /MB because of regulations. And outside Europe it's 20.53 US$ /MB because we do not have regulations on that.
So I can really see how regulations is hurting me.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Available for Consulting and Speakerships

  • Available for Consulting & Speaking
    Tomi Ahonen is a bestselling author whose twelve books on mobile have already been referenced in over 100 books by his peers. Rated the most influential expert in mobile by Forbes in December 2011, Tomi speaks regularly at conferences doing about 20 public speakerships annually. With over 250 public speaking engagements, Tomi been seen by a cumulative audience of over 100,000 people on all six inhabited continents. The former Nokia executive has run a consulting practise on digital convergence, interactive media, engagement marketing, high tech and next generation mobile. Tomi is currently based out of Hong Kong but supports Fortune 500 sized companies across the globe. His reference client list includes Axiata, Bank of America, BBC, BNP Paribas, China Mobile, Emap, Ericsson, Google, Hewlett-Packard, HSBC, IBM, Intel, LG, MTS, Nokia, NTT DoCoMo, Ogilvy, Orange, RIM, Sanomamedia, Telenor, TeliaSonera, Three, Tigo, Vodafone, etc. To see his full bio and his books, visit Tomi Ahonen lectures at Oxford University's short courses on next generation mobile and digital convergence. Follow him on Twitter as @tomiahonen. Tomi also has a Facebook and Linked In page under his own name. He is available for consulting, speaking engagements and as expert witness, please write to tomi (at) tomiahonen (dot) com

Tomi's eBooks on Mobile Pearls

  • Pearls Vol 1: Mobile Advertising
    Tomi's first eBook is 171 pages with 50 case studies of real cases of mobile advertising and marketing in 19 countries on four continents. See this link for the only place where you can order the eBook for download

Tomi Ahonen Almanac 2009

  • Tomi Ahonen Almanac 2009
    A comprehensive statistical review of the total mobile industry, in 171 pages, has 70 tables and charts, and fits on your smartphone to carry in your pocket every day.

Alan's Third Book: No Straight Lines

Tomi's Fave Twitterati