My Photo

Ordering Information

Tomi on Twitter is @tomiahonen

  • Follow Tomi on Twitter as @tomiahonen
    Follow Tomi's Twitterfloods on all matters mobile, tech and media. Tomi has over 8,000 followers and was rated by Forbes as the most influential writer on mobile related topics

Book Tomi T Ahonen to Speak at Your Event

  • Contact Tomi T Ahonen for Speaking and Consulting Events
    Please write email to tomi (at) tomiahonen (dot) com and indicate "Speaking Event" or "Consulting Work" or "Expert Witness" or whatever type of work you would like to offer. Tomi works regularly on all continents

Tomi on Video including his TED Talk

  • Tomi on Video including his TED Talk
    See Tomi on video from several recent keynote presentations and interviews, including his TED Talk in Hong Kong about Augmented Reality as the 8th Mass Media

Subscribe


Blog powered by Typepad

« Mo Mobile mAdness - Ecosystem-Elop Sells Nokia Mobile Ad Unit (??? - True!) | Main | No Straight Lines: an open access participatory book »

February 10, 2012

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e0097e337c8833016762165c09970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Truth. The Whole Truth. And Nothing But.. the Burning Platforms Memo is 1 Year Old.:

Comments

Sander van der Wal

Tomi, let's assume that Ovi Store is as big as Apple's App Store, making as much money for developers. You yourself have written how bad a business writing apps is, even for Apple developers. Now imagine having about ten times as many developers having to share the same pie.

Then look at the number of app. Less apps than Apple in lots more time.

The numbers just do not add up.

So to say that Nokia's developer ecosystem was healthy, is in my mind simply not true.

julian t

Wow. Just wow. What a good read. I do agree that this memo has damaged Nokia really badly, and I'm a good example of it. After using Nokia phones for more than 10 years, I've moved on to Android due to its similarity to Symbian (minus the excellent Nokia hardware). Windows Phone will not even come close to the flexibility of these OS's.

Thanks for the amazing read!

TomiFan

Tomi, could you please stop talking about "Nokia was able to have three MeeGo handsets available"? You refer to N950 as if it could be shipped in next month. With all that talk you give the impression that you have never tried out N950 (or N9), since you are ignoring the plain fact that 50% of the N9 swipe UI is in portrait locked mode. Yes. 50%.
Enable landscape-mode HW-QWERTY to that and you suddenly notice that the keyboard of the device is useless half of the time. It's not something that can be fixed in a snap of fingers. And this applies to places like Facebook client where you would most need the QWERTY.
Also: N9 UI depends on the virtual keyboard as much as it is locked to portrait. Want to add attachment to your message (turn SMS to MMS)? Button is in VKB. Want to add smiley? VKB? Want actually SEND it? Virtual. Keyboard. Is. The. Only. Place. Open the HW keyboard and you cannot attach anything nor send the message.
And this is where N950 is. Not ready to be shipped today, this month, next month and definitely not last year.
On the same notice (and I still feel you have not tried a bit N9): N9 has forward facing camera that Lumia 800 does not, true.
N9 can not make video calls any more than Lumia 800 can. Only known application that utilises the forward facing camera is "mirror" that is just a toy to be ordered to your phone. N9 was finished with such a hurry that it lacks this kind of mandatory features and at same time includes tight integration to Skype, which you constantly blame to be the thing that makes operators hate Microsoft. (So they won't hate Nokia for that?)
You're right on the fact that the burning platform memo costed a lot, but it still doesn't mean that MeeGo would have been on fast track to success.

ej victor

TomiFan:

My N9 sits before me in landscape mode, Swype keyboard works just fine in landscape... try doing a firmware upgrade. I think you miss Tomi's point. Meego was abandoned by Elop, even this dead abandoned OS is getting updates faster then Symbian or WP7. The N9 as an open system is also getting "hacks" and "tweaks" at an alarming rate, not to mention PR1.2 out soon.

Meego is so impressive that an American customer paid $875 for the phone, this phone if released in the USA would have been a game changer for Nokia, this from my unscientific sample of 100's of friends, and colleauges in AT&T Mobility who have played with my phone and have been utterly captivated by the seductive UX. Elop is so embarrased of the N9's sucess he will not release sales numbers.

Another aspect of the N( UX that is mind boggeling is the ability to VNC into the phone which means being able to fully control the phone from any PC via wifi...I can have the phone in the car in the parking lot and text and e-mail from my PC 100's of meters away. TRY THAT WITH AN iPhone!

elm70

Excellent article Tomi,

Very nice the word by word analysis of the Elop's memo.

You stated that -> true Stephen Elop as the 'delusional psycopath' who would destroy Nokia.

But, a person can be "mad", maybe even a powerful CEO can be "mad", but it is very very rare.
But, this mad person have a "boss", actually a group of bosses, these have placed him as CEO of Nokia, these can kick him out of Nokia in no time.

Now, it is crystal clear that Elop memo and Elop strategy is wrong, totally wrong.
Only winner of this Elop-Nokia strategy is Microsoft. (As well Google and Apple did benefit from Nokia suicide strategy)

Are the people that placed Elop as CEO in Nokia also mad ? Everybody is mad or lunatic ?

Anyhow, who are these people?
I will help you with two links:

Dodge -> over 5%
http://www.4-traders.com/NOKIA-6468/news/NOKIA-Notification-under-Chapter-2-Section-10-of-the-Finnish-Securities-Market-Act-holdings-of-Dodge-13703694/

Capital Group -> over 5%
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/notification-under-chapter-2-section-10-of-the-finnish-securities-market-act-holdings-of-the-capital-group-companies-inc-in-nokia-corporation-exceeded-5-55959197.html

Yes, 2 American funds own over 10% of Nokia, yes, this is more then enough for have full control in a fragmented share ownership like Nokia.

Tomi, please, I'm sure you have better connection then most of us, if you want you can find more about it.

Tchuss

e_lm_70

ps: Anyhow, is also Jorma a "psycopath", he has been supporting all the time Elop strategy ? I think he also did his dirty job in this very dirty story ... 30k people lost a job, more will, because of Elop & Friends

Dan Colasanti

For a little perspective - Follow this graph from Q4-2008 through Q1-2011:
http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=NOK+Interactive#chart2:symbol=nok;range=5y;indicator=volume;charttype=line;crosshair=on;ohlcvalues=0;logscale=on;source=undefined

Q: What did Elop have to do with that?
A: Absolutely Nothing. It's the predecessor CEO's failure to compete with the radical market change brought on by Apple and Android - Period.

Here's more perspective from CES 2012:

Q: Did the CES 2012 Best of Show Award go to a Symbian or MeeGo smartphone?
A: Um, no. It went to Elop's 3rd Child, the Nokia Lumia 900: http://www.cesweb.org/awards/bestOfCES.asp

It's hard to have perspective when your neck-deep in your own pride. MeeGo was a solid OS but what Nokia's demise between 2007 and 2011 did not come about by Elop's platform speech (which hadn't been delivered yet). It came about because Nokia's previous CEO had failed to understand the changed dynamic of the smartphone market - that it was no longer just about devices but also about the global eco-system.

One year later with Elop-era products just starting to hit the market is too early to judge Nokia, which makes the timing of this manifesto seem like a last ditch attempt to apply for martyrdom. Over the last year the stock has continued to plummet, in part because of Elop's memo killing MeeGo (which was unlikely to successfully compete on a global scale), and in part because of the continued inability of Symbian to compete with iOS and Android. Was Elop's memo well-received? No. But only time will tell whether or not he was right or justified in delivering it and setting Nokia on a new course.

If Nokia had failed with MeeGo, 100% of Nokia would have been laid-off, not just dissenters. Now it looks like Nokia has a chance at success and the last three quarters of 2012 will be a telling sign of which direction that stock price will go. So far, with the Lumia 800 and 900, it's looking good.

vantsuyoshi

Symbian nokia is death, face the truth
I live in indonesia, country where nokia was a strong brand here
until suddenly blackberry popular and become number one
and samsung attack from low price point + bonus attack from chinese/local brand

so its funny you blame it all to Elop,
if there is shit thing he did is the first 2 windows phone dont have front camera, all spec beated by htc windows phone

i doubt anyone buy nokia asha here, people will choose samsung android galaxy young for that price point
$150 nokia asha vs $100 samsung galaxy young
get it?

Timo Koola

Let's play Sherlock Holmes. So Tomi states: "then Nokia should have sold 168 million smartphones this year. Instead, Nokia only sold 77 million". Who and where did those 91 million customers go to that picked something else (or didn't buy a phone at all because Nokia killed Symbian/MeeGo)? Any breakdown analysis Tomi btw. Android/RIM/Apple? You did one before hand, but at least RIM failed to fully materialize the "customer giveaway" as you nicely put it.

vladkr

Dear Tomi,

Yes, it's a long read, but if you see the amount of comments on your penultimate article, it was awaited (I even was afraid that S.Elop hired killers against you).

Anyway, you put the accent on the memo, but let me share my feelings as a Nokia fan, customer and small shareholder.

To me, it's not just the memo, but all what was done after that. I haven't read the memo before you put it here, in your article.

What I saw however, is the decision to get and keep Windows as the only available platform.

I saw high quality and desirable cellphones (N9, 701...) very difficult to get.

I saw factories closures - I'm sensible on it because although I live in Canada now, I'm European and I still pay taxes in Europe - and a lot of people losing their jobs.

I saw ridiculous promotional campaigns for Lumia range; as I said before, Dell and LG winphones were given for free to people, cupcakes and drinks offered at train stations, the "Amazing" word everywhere in a Simon game designed background.

I saw faithful bloggers supporting passionately Lumia products over other products.

So, what I saw is a promotion for Microsoft, and some typical North-American management, not just a memo.

Then, even promotion for Microsoft isn't well done; as another (well criticized) analyst, Eldar Murtazin, pointed out, no effort is made by Nokia.

It took 8 months to put standard windows phone hardware in a N9 shape and to subcontract it, and they're proud of it?

The Lumia flagship, the 910 is already obsolete, and won't enter the market before Spring, so it will be even more obsolete. Is that a serious way to make business?

Microsoft promised to help Nokia technically, to make Nokia Windows Phone unique.

It appears that HTC engineers know the OS better than Microsoft developers (which is not surprising as everybody at MS is a director/white collar), so they're able to break OS's limits (ie. 12Mpix camera for example) and to offer better products.

I could write a comment as long as your article so I'll stop here...

To me, it's not just a memo, it's a bunch of actions, which are understandable and profit only to few ones, as even Microsoft doesn't benefit from it (in the short term).

It looks like these old cartoons where water was replaced by alcohol. Yes, Stephen Elop is the fireman who replaced water with alcohol faking his try to save the building, but adding even more fire.

P.S. I don't know how well Lumia sales do. I visited almost every store that could sell Lumia 710 in Quebec City - pop = 500 000 - and in one week, a two digits figure of items were sold (I can't be precise, but less than 100 for sure). But "Lumia range is a success, welcome to North Korea!"

Earendil Star

I see that delusional visions of THT Elop actions continue to find supporters in people commenting.
We are talking about the effects for Nokia here, not for Microsoft or WP, but apparently many are not noticing.

Anyway, for anyone interested on the debunking of their reasoning, I refer to my previous posts.

One thing instead I wish to reiterate.

THT Elop's "Burning Platform" memo has a really simple explanation: you need to create a sense of urgency, emergency and panic if you want to force actions or policies that would never get through under normal circumstances, because anybody in a normal situation would regard them as crazy.

It is a well known tactic in many fields, from management to government.

Whenever you create a sense of emergency, you induce people to believe that an action needs to be taken fast, you minimize the time people have to critically think at what is being proposed. And suddenly, magically, the unthinkable becomes possible.

Thus, you pave the way to whatever action you may be interested in pursuing.
You then concoct a minimally plausible explanation of what you intend to do and why, and that's it.
If you need more factual support, a couple of misrepresentations may well serve the purpose.

Et voila! Here comes WP (WP????? The 0.000X% OS????) in place of the incumbent Symbian / Maemo ecosystem!

Nokia is now just a low margin OEM of a commoditized OS like WP? With no ecosystem left (oops, WP ecosystem is actually... MS's, not Nokia's...)?
Stopping in house production and outsourcing everything to the likes of Compal? At the mercy of a single OS provider instead of diversifying?
Being deprived of its best bits (patents, maps, brand, carrier aggrements, etc.) piece by piece without anyone noticing?
Oh, who cares about that. That is only minor details. Why bother!

Yes Tomi, this memo has been the most effective value destroyer for a company in history! Ever! No doubt!

elm70

@vladkr

The memo by itself was not causing a big damage to Nokia, once leaked the Nokia share price (it was around his year high due to the good Q4 results) if did not change much.

Yes the memo was having incongruence and it was painted in red blinking colours, but it could also be read that Nokia need a shake up, yes the sentiment written in the memo was agreed, the war was about eco-system, yes android popularity was starting to attack Nokia market (Apple did not really took customers from Nokia at that time)

In the memo is written that "This means we’re going to have to decide how we either build, catalyse or join an ecosystem."

That could be read in tons of positive ways: strength the current symbian eco-system, or build the MeeGo one, or eventually join the most popular Android eco-system ... any of this three was a possible and wise decision to be explained in the incoming new strategy.

The unexpected was what happen days later, announcing with BallMerd that Nokia drop everything for join Microsoft.
Three wrong decisions in one. Drop the current production, lose the eco-system (Microsoft own the eco-sytstem of Windows Phones) and join the worst and weakest Mobile OS in the market.
Once the new strategy got announced, Nokia made -30% on the market in few hours.

Tchuss

e_lm_70

ps: I would also not forget that since new strategy was announced, immediately Nokia changed, before every month Nokia did announce multiple mobile phones per months, 4 or 5 in average. Fact is that after the announce Nokia stop bring new phones on the market, having only old phones on sales that have been self disbanded by the CEO, it was an additional contribution of Nokia self destruction.

pps: Good result of Nokia in Q4 2010 are not due to Elop, this is an inheritance from previous CEO/Managemt strategy and execution. Since Elop is CEO of Nokia he did nothing good the the company, NOTHING !

Mikko

"I welcome comments on this blog. Please note, I have a rule, your comment must reflect the fact..."

Dear Tomi: I also hope you are ready to follow the rule "your comment must reflect the fact". I expand it to cover also the blog post itself.

Remember, I asked you to alter you last blog article "Mo Mobile mAdness - Ecosystem-Elop Sells Nokia Mobile Ad Unit (??? - True!)" to be more truthful because Nokia/Navteq didn't sell its mobile ad unit 10/2011 but TV and radio ad business to Radiate media.

Because that is the truth, right? You have not still taken actions to fix the points that I've proven to be false. Show you're worth your high level words.

One more link for you:
http://techcrunch.com/2011/11/01/after-acquiring-navteq-ad-group-matchbin-becomes-radiate-media-adds-22-million-in-financing/

Thanks.

---

I agree totally the leaked memo has had some effects.

But it's exaggeration to draw a conclusion that with Symbian/Meego lineup Nokia would still be the king of the hill.

Your analysis has so called ceteris paribus hypothesis and therefore a big problem. I strongly claim iPhone and Android would have dethroned Symbian from #1 position was the memo leaked or not. Or would Nokia have relied solely (in smartphones) on Symbian/Meego-combination. Ceteris paribus rule may work in books of economic science, but rarely in reality.

Downturn in market share was inevitable and there is no single manager in our universe who could have stopped Symbian's market share slide. Therefore with or without Elop, Nokia would have lost it's market share anyway.

So it's more truthful to discuss which percentage of the market share slide is Elop's action's fault including the memo and MS deal. Tomi says 100%, I'd say the percentage is much much lower...

zlutor

@ej victor: yes, yes, yes!

I also use an N9 and it is just simply _good_. Of course, it can be made even better just like anything else but really works well. PR1.2 bring working fron facing camera and DLNA - the two feature I really lack at the moment.

With working FFC video calls will work with Skype - I hope - and with DLNA I can connect it with my TV set without any cable to see videos made in the kindergarden... :-)

And finally I can make apps with QT Developer if I really miss something - amazing...

it would heve been really interesting if N9 being released worldwide. Any numbers from China? Just to see how it performs when it has opportunity to scale. (OK, no real opportunity there due to pricing but anyway...)

Kirill Zelenski

yes. fantastic text.
I disagree only with "Nokia was recovering under Elop's leadership first 5 months".
on my opinion these first 5 months Elop was doing nothing to recover Nokia, waiting to issues burning memo. It was the grow planned and produced by OPK, Anssi etc. Elop was not leading that, just forced to stop it ASAP.

still question why Jorma Ollila decided to take him onboard... Ollila is much more responsible for that. Elop is just MS muppet and doing what he have to do and used to do - whole his working life he was selling his companies...

Baron95

Tomi misses the brilliance of the Burning Platform Memo, by ignoring the "Jumping of the platform into icy waters" part.

Elop knew the consequences would be severe - he correctly briefed the board and his memo correctly accounted for near term greater pain.

After the jump is the terrible long fall, followed by a painful crash into the water, followed by sinking deep and running out of breath, followed struggling to come up for air, followed by being in chilly waters, followed hopefully by a rescue and recovery.

Microsoft is suffering much greater short term pain than if it had continued with Windows Mobile in 2011 instead of the daring switch to Windows Phone.

Apple suffered incredible pain, almost going out of business, when they ditched the PowerPC processors to switch to Intel.

Motorola suffered incredible pain, and is only now reaching break even, when it switched from Symbian and Windows Mobile to Android.

Switching platforms is never easy. And the CEOs that do it, know full well, that near term pain and turmoil is inevitable.

The alternative is the spectacle that is happening with RIM or the Japanese FOMO handset vendors. They are being decimated.

I guess Tomi just wants Nokia to be like Fujitsu, NEC, Panasonic, which are starting to incur massive losses and disappearing into oblivion in the face of iOS and Android ecosystems.

Nokia will come up for air, after the icy water plunge, in 2013 as Windows 8 tablets, phones, ARM ultrabooks, PCs are all running Windows 8 with mobile Microsoft office, etc.

That is the play Elop and the Nokia board made. And Elop is executing flawlessly. One year after the memo, and Nokia is already shipping several new platform handsets and has agreements for subsidized sales by AT&T and other top US operators, that have shut Nokia off.

That is outstanding progress. So lets celebrate Elop's vision *AND* flawless execution of the vision.

Now Mr. Elop, cut the cancer that NSN is. Take a clue from Sanjay Jha - spin the cancer off. Gift it to Siemens. Focus on the Mobile turnaround story.

Baron95

Lets contrast Nokia's Elop with RIM's Thor.

Elop Nokia Feb/2011 - Major Changes Needed - Stock goes up a bit, then stays mostly flat, down later in the year as NSN losses mount and the truth about channel stuffing comes to light. CEO is highly praised and respect by all business press.

Thor RIM Feb/2012 - "We don't need major changes" - BOOM - Stock falls 16%, CEO starts to backtrack and is called a "clown" by the press. Company loses all respect.

I'll take Elop over keep it the same OPK/Thor/Tomi.

khim

Baron95: Apple suffered incredible pain, almost going out of business, when they ditched the PowerPC processors to switch to Intel.

Please don't spread lies around, Ok? Take a look on chart:

http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=AAPL+Interactive#chart1:symbol=aapl;range=my;indicator=volume;charttype=line;crosshair=on;ohlcvalues=0;logscale=on;source=undefined

Steve Jobs returned in 1996 and indeed in 1997 Apple hit the lowest point. But it was NOT because it burned it's platform and tried to do some kind of switch. In fact TILL 1999 APPLE CONTINUED TO SELL IT'S LONG-OBSOLETE MACOS CLASSIC - and market rewarded it: Apple's market cap grew TEN TIMES in this period. Only when Apple was sure they'll survive switch to radically different MacOS X they started the process - and for a long time they supported both platforms. Market was not enthusiastic (AAPL fell more then NASDAQ in that period), but Apple was no longer in danger of dying.

And Intel switch? That happened in 2006. Try to find market reaction. You'll be hard pressed indeed. Because there are none.

Why? Well... take a look on Steve's announcement: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghdTqnYnFyg

See the difference? "We are the best, we will continue to be the best tomorrow, but to be number one the day after we need this switch. We already did that once, we know what we are doing, we are not abandoning you. Oh, and I, personally, already did that switch already - and you can not even see that on first glance".

Nothing like Elop's panic with nothing to show and with decision to abandon everything right away when replacement is not even on horizon.

Oh and don't forget that both transitions ("from MacOS Classic to MacOS X" and "from PowerPC to Intel") kept support for the valuable ecosystem: MacOS X supported MacOS Classic applications and MacOS Intel supported PowerPC applications (and believe me, it's about as hard to do as to support Qt applications on WP7).

If Elop wanted to save Nokia then he would have put an ultimatum to Microsoft: new OS must run old Symbian applications. There are nothing impossible in this demand, if Microsoft refused then for Android Nokia can even do the work itself. And note that for a long time Symbian actually had MORE applications then WP7. If we are talking battle of the ecosystems then why drop this advantage before replacement is ready?

Instead Nokia broke everything and went with totally incompatible platform with not transition path. Apple did that, too - with Mac. And they lost leadership in a PC market as a result. Steve was much younger back then, he never repeated this error after that. But looks like Elop need this lesson taught to him personally. To bad Nokia must suffer through it, too.

Baron95

Easy now Khim. You are coming unhinged. You seem to be personally invested in this. Are you like Tomi that is seeing old SMS-based consulting opportunities disappear and getting upset? Or are you a developer that bet wrongly on Qt? Relax. There are plenty of opportunities in the real world.

Elop also, like Jobs, planned an overlap between Symbian and Windows. or haven't you noticed that he has release more Symbian updates (Ana, Belle) on-time and with high quality than anything Nokia has ever done since before S60? And haven't you noticed that he has planned for a multi year transition, with Windows Phone, only slowly taking hold? Like in through 2016.

The sales drop and market share drop is the same that RIM saw in the US. Due to iPhone and Android becoming available in more markets, more operators, and Elop correctly de-stuffing the channel.

It doesn't matter how many thousands of words Tomi writes, saying that Nokia would grow sales if it had stuck with Symbian/Meego. It would never ever had happened. Everyone else also abandoned Meego as DOW - not a single full Meego device ever reached the market.

And yes - Apple took a huge risk, and it was very painful to the whole ecosystem when they switched to Intel, and no key application ever ran well in compatibility/emulation mode.

And the difference is that Apple is a Silicon Valley company, that can move in Internet speed. Nokia moves at Finish glacial pace. It could not even make one OS competitive, let alone 2 or 3.

Elop and every sane CEO or board member knows this. You and Tomi, perhaps have this notion that Nokia can develop great SW. They can't. Never could, never will.

Going to an American OS was the only solution.

HCE

@Baron95

I generally agree with you but I think calling Elop the second coming of Steve Jobs is going a bit too far. Not that I disagree with you entirely - I don't think Nokia would eventually gone the way of RIM had they stuck to their original course. Perhaps going solely with Microsoft was the right choice - I don't know. I am willing to give Elop the benefit of the doubt here.

However, what is unforgivable is how he communicated his new strategy to the rest of his company and the world. I'm sorry, but no CEO should say "we're moving over to a new platform that is completely incompatible with our current ones and, by the way, our current platforms suck!" That would be extremely unwise even if Nokia had Windows Phone devices ready to ship at the time of the announcement. Making such an announcement when the new platform is 9-12 months away is grounds for ousting the CEO and the board that authorized this hare-brained scheme.

I disagree with Tomi's contention that MeeGo was such a wonderful platform that could have pulled Nokia's fat out of the fire find it hard to disagree with his view that the unnecessarily premature and overly-dramatic announcement caused Nokia no end of trouble. Given that you have made the Apple comparison, why don't we look at how Apple handles a product announcement. Nobody talks about new products until they are ready to ship. We know now that Apple planned the move to Intel processors for years. However, we never got an announcement to the effect of "we're very unhappy with the PowerPC platform and we'll be switching to Intel a year down the line." Apple did not say a word until all pieces for the transition were in place.

There were many ways in which Nokia could have spun the agreement with Microsoft. One obvious way would have been to say that they were partnering with Microsoft exclusively in the American market and, once some degree of success had been achieved, they could have talked about dumping their other platforms.

Would Nokia's smartphone sales have tanked regardless of what Elop did? I can't say for sure but if what is happening with RIM is any guide, chances are that with a more prudent announcement of the Microsoft partnership and no Burning Platform memo, chances are that Nokia's market share and profit would have slowly declined - giving the company more than enough time to fully transition over to the Microsoft platform.

- HCE

Sander van der Wal

As a developer I can clearly relate to the sentiment that an investment into Qt would have been a disaster after the adoption of WinMob. I was this close to investing in Qt, as Nokia appeared to have finally got ts act together after Green killed the two stupid UI's and unified them. Everything else is other people's money, though my pension fund is likely to have some Nokia stock.

Anyway, it does show that alternative actions, such as not announcing the windows deal until devices were ready in volume an then murdering Qt and Symbian and MeeGo would have had a catastrofic effect on Nokia too. Now it's the owners of Nokia taking the pain, as it should be. That s after all the risk assciated with owning a business.

Afaiac, Elop had little choice, and they made two mistakes.

1, the effect on the channel was completely misunderstood. Everybody thought it was consumers that would not buy Symbian devices. It was the channel instead, which nobody had predicted.

2, they should have insisted on having Qt on Windows mobile too, for a year or five. Then developers would have been able to make the transition, an microsoft would have saved face.

Poifan

I've got to agree with Baron95 that one of the points of the burning platform memo was that the jump was going to be painful and risky. There's still a good change it may fail, but I do think the alternative would be worse; a slow decline to irrelevancy.

No amount of Symbian sales numbers can change what I saw happening in late 2010/11; my N8 was clearly not competitive with iOs, Android, or even WP7 when it came to day to day productivity. Sure it had great specs and some clever features like "USB on the go", but when it came to email,texting,social networking and other essential uses it was slow, cumbersome and unstable to use in comparison to the others. As far as app backwards compatibility that was hardly an issue in moving to any of the the other platforms as there were very few unique Symbian apps to even worry about.

The N9 is a beautiful phone, but's it's too late in the game to compete alone against the Apple and Google juggernauts (Intel's a weak partner). If Nokia had stayed this route, I think they would have become the Volvo/Saab of smartphones; wonderful products with a fiercely loyal but limited customer base.

cycnus

Hi Tomi,

Great article, as always.

I just wanna add something here: Elop were right on a price things*.... That's if the phone is great, people will be happy to pay a lot of $$$*, that's why he launched the Nokia Lumia 800 today in Indonesia with US$ 200 without contract. Because he know NO ONE will buy it at US$ 500.

*Actually, nokia know this very well, the nokia communicator used to be priced around US$ 1200-1500 in Indonesia, and no one care about the price.

Baron95

You guys talk as if Nokia had full control of "how" to announce the Windows Phone platform switch over time.

1 - It would have been a greater disaster if it had leaked (as it would) that Nokia was working with Microsoft.

2 - It was very likely *A CONDITION* of all the money and special concessions that Microsoft made to Nokia, to put a definite nail in the coffin of Meego and definite end of life date on Symbian.

Nokia is getting on the order of $250M/quarter from Microsoft, plus special concessions that no one else gets. Don't you think that Microsoft required ("bought") the strong wording in the announcements.

Some people here are like school children, that think they life in a fairy tale world. In business you usually have to give something to get something.

Google offered nothing to Nokia - just standard terms. Microsoft offered a lot, but in exchange for a clear public vote of confidence on Windows Phone ecosystem.

End of Story.

That memo and the following announcement, and the deal with Apple, and the deal with Qualcomm, were all very well thought out and orchestrated. Nokia, Apple and Microsoft are now all made-up in their fight against Android.

Elop was not "venting frustration" or making poorly thought-out remarks. Everything is part of the plan and very carefully orchestrated. That is how the game is played at that level by the pros.

Mi

Baron95

It is laughable for anyone to think Microsoft would ever allow Qt for Windows phone. You must not know how Microsoft competes and how fiercely they are controlling the Windows Phone developer ecosystem. They have learned their lesson from Apple.

Just let it go. Nokia never had a chance in SW development and a SW ecosystem against the Silicon Valley giants - Apple and Google.

Microsoft at least has the money, has their Silicon Valley campus, and know a thing of two about SW and how to cater to developers.

Elop and the board knew that it was "pay the price now" or be like RIM and Greece and pay a much heavier price later.

R

@Baron95: You completely misunderstand the technology of Apple's transitions. I question your motives when you accuse Khim of being unhinged. With your direct contradiction of basic facts (Symbian sales increasing, ASP increasing, profits increasing, which you say "never ever" would happen), I think maybe you're the one who's unhinged.

Every transition that Apple has made to Macs, they kept selling the old model, and they maintained backwards compatibility with the apps for a while. Indeed, after their first major transition, from Motorola 68k CPUs to IBM PowerPC CPUs in 1994, you could continue to run 68k programs until the Intel transition in 2006. In the past few revisions, they haven't maintained compatibility as well, but you can generally run current programs on new Macs.

In every transition, the new Macs were positioned as being like the old Macs, but faster and prettier. Furthermore, Apple briefed their partners before every transition, so it was never a surprise. Therefore, the transitions did no noticeable harm to Apple's market share or profits.

Now, contrast Nokia. They continue selling Symbian phones, but the phones are a dead end. There's no compatibility, no likeness at all between the Symbian phone and the Windows Phone. An investment in Symbian is wasted, because you have to start all over with Windows Phone. And Nokia has to start all over with Windows Phone, which is why they have such a precipitous drop in market share.

For that matter, Microsoft had to start over with Windows Phone. That's why Windows Phone never beats even Windows Mobile for market share.

I don't know about the rest of the world, but I personally wanted a Maemo/Meego phone. I've wanted one since 2008. And I was considering settling for a Symbian phone, because of Qt, when the platform was set on fire. Now I will no longer consider buying a Nokia phone. I'm just an anecdote, but enough people like me are an interesting statistic.

When the Meego project was announced, I was apprehensive, because I was worried about bureaucratic interference. Nokia was developing Maemo just fine by itself. It turns out that I was right to worry.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Available for Consulting and Speakerships

  • Available for Consulting & Speaking
    Tomi Ahonen is a bestselling author whose twelve books on mobile have already been referenced in over 100 books by his peers. Rated the most influential expert in mobile by Forbes in December 2011, Tomi speaks regularly at conferences doing about 20 public speakerships annually. With over 250 public speaking engagements, Tomi been seen by a cumulative audience of over 100,000 people on all six inhabited continents. The former Nokia executive has run a consulting practise on digital convergence, interactive media, engagement marketing, high tech and next generation mobile. Tomi is currently based out of Hong Kong but supports Fortune 500 sized companies across the globe. His reference client list includes Axiata, Bank of America, BBC, BNP Paribas, China Mobile, Emap, Ericsson, Google, Hewlett-Packard, HSBC, IBM, Intel, LG, MTS, Nokia, NTT DoCoMo, Ogilvy, Orange, RIM, Sanomamedia, Telenor, TeliaSonera, Three, Tigo, Vodafone, etc. To see his full bio and his books, visit www.tomiahonen.com Tomi Ahonen lectures at Oxford University's short courses on next generation mobile and digital convergence. Follow him on Twitter as @tomiahonen. Tomi also has a Facebook and Linked In page under his own name. He is available for consulting, speaking engagements and as expert witness, please write to tomi (at) tomiahonen (dot) com

Tomi's eBooks on Mobile Pearls

  • Pearls Vol 1: Mobile Advertising
    Tomi's first eBook is 171 pages with 50 case studies of real cases of mobile advertising and marketing in 19 countries on four continents. See this link for the only place where you can order the eBook for download

Tomi Ahonen Almanac 2009

  • Tomi Ahonen Almanac 2009
    A comprehensive statistical review of the total mobile industry, in 171 pages, has 70 tables and charts, and fits on your smartphone to carry in your pocket every day.

Alan's Third Book: No Straight Lines

Tomi's Fave Twitterati